My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0319
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:24 AM
Creation date
3/28/2007 11:26:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/19/2007
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session <br />Monday, March 19, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2. Council Communications, Reports and Announcements <br />None. <br /> <br />3. Joint Meeting with the Ethics Commission <br />Commissioners LuAnne Pederson and Michael Schneider were present rep- <br />resenting the Ethics Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schneider reviewed the work in progress to-date among <br />Commissioners, staff and City Attorney Scott Anderson related to establish- <br />ing procedures for the Ethics Commission. Commissioner Schneider sought <br />Council clarification and direction on several issues, including the role of the <br />City Manager and Ethics Commission in coordinating seminars, and lan- <br />guage clarification in Resolution 10408 and City Code Chapter 206.04, Sec- <br />tion C; and creation of procedures for ethics issues before they become eth- <br />ics complaints and whether the City Council wanted the Commission to con- <br />tinue development of such a process. <br /> <br />Discussion among City Councilmembers and Commissioners included the <br />City Council's majority perception of the role of the Ethics Commission, the <br />City Manager and the City Attorney; and the original intent of Mayor Klaus- <br />ing in proposing reinstatement of the Ethics Commission and the role of the <br />Commission in identifying topics and or speakers for training, with staff fol- <br />lowing through on the logistics of such a training seminar. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schneider sought clarification of the Ethics Commission's <br />role to avoid overextending into another person or Commission's turf; and <br />sought written confirmation ofthe Commission's role and responsibilities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined that the purpose of the Ethics Commission <br />was to field complaints against them regarding elected officials. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe apologized for not attending the February and March <br />meetings of the Ethics Commission; clarified that Commissioner Schneider <br />was the Chair, and that Commissioner Pederson served as the Vice Chair. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that his interpretation was that the Ethics Com- <br />mission would serve in an advisory capacity to the City Manager and in his <br />efforts to coordinate development of applicable training programs for the <br />City Council and staff as appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.