Laserfiche WebLink
442 <br />443 <br />444 <br />445 <br />446 <br />447 <br />448 <br />449 <br />450 <br />451 <br />452 <br />453 <br />454 <br />455 <br />456 <br />457 <br />458 <br />459 <br />460 <br />461 <br />462 <br />463 <br />464 <br />465 <br />466 <br />467 <br />468 <br />469 <br />470 <br />471 <br />472 <br />473 <br />474 <br />475 <br />476 <br />477 <br />478 <br />479 <br />480 <br />481 <br />482 <br />483 <br />484 <br />485 <br />486 <br />487 <br />9. <br />Member Gjerdingen questioned whether the policy should include provision to <br />allow undergrounding just on its own merits, such as if neighbors didn't like the <br />looks of overhead lines. <br />Chair Vanderwall noted that this concern was addressed for neighborhood - <br />initiated projects in the final paragraphs of the policy under "Funding of <br />Projects." <br />Member Gj erdingen opined that he was in agreement with that. <br />At the request of Chair Vanderw <br />move ahead without benefit of revi <br />61011 <br />the PWETC was willing to <br />ie maj orit s willing to do <br />Member Felice moved, Me er nlund sec 6W, approval of recommending <br />the Underground Conversion of Overhead Electric Utility Lines Policy," with <br />typographical correction as noted, to the City Council for their review and <br />consideration. <br />Member Felice opined that she liked the design standards, especially for that area, <br />and as Roseville became more densely - populated and open spaces became more <br />valuable. <br />Chair Vanderwall concurred, noting that his previous concerns about accessibility <br />for non - motorized traffic from roadways had been addressed through his review <br />of the design standards. <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />