2012-06-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

218 those projects lacked the knowledge of these runoff concerns, or they lacked 219 initiative to comply with efforts to manage storm water. 220 Comprehensive Surface tater Management Plan ( CSWMP) were available for a 221 Member Stenlund questioned if there shouldn't be recourse for projects falling 222 under the 10,000 square feet of land disturbance threshold, or consideration done 223 on a case by case basis depending on the topography of the land as one issue. 224 225 Mr. Schwartz advised that staff could revisit the issue and whether a permit was 226 required by City Code or not, there could be other ways to address those 227 individual areas of concern. 228 Staff noted that the City's overall Comprehensive Plan established the City's 229 Ms. Bloom advised that staff often addressed concerns or issues, outside the 230 regular parameters of City Code (e.g. Cleveland Avenue) when illicit discharges 231 were observed; with staff able to use other sections of City Code to address those 232 situations. However, Ms. Bloom concurred that additional outreach to and 233 education of citizens was always p dent. 234 PWETC and the public related to managing water and natural resource areas 235 Mr. Schwartz advised that staff had ready held discussions with the Parks and 236 Recreation Commission on storm water management and potential BMP 237 education and outreach efforts, incorporated through the Parks Master Plan and 238 coordination with the Harriet Alexander Nature Center (HANC), consistent with 239 tonight's discussion. Ak 240 241 As previously noted, no one from the public was present to provide comment on 242 this program. 243 244 6. Storm Water Management Plan Updated Discussion 245 Ron Leaf, Sr. Water Resources Engineer and Rebecca Nestingen, PE, Water 246 Resources Engineer with E.H., consultants with the City for updating its 247 Comprehensive Surface tater Management Plan ( CSWMP) were available for a 248 brief presentation and to lead initial discussions with the PWETC. Staff noted 249 that S.E.H. had drafted the original CSWMP and would be overseeing this update 250 as well, given their familiarity with the City. 251 252 Staff noted that CWSMP was originally developed in 1990, and last updated 253 in 2002; and re %�ed for update to maintain consistency with local watershed 254 standards and the etropolitan Surface Water Management Act (MSWMA). 255 Staff noted that the City's overall Comprehensive Plan established the City's 256 vision and BMP's for managing storm water and surface water drainage 257 throughout the City. 258 259 Staff noted that the primary goals of tonight's meeting was to provide an 260 overview on the update process and schedule; and to receive input from the 261 PWETC and the public related to managing water and natural resource areas 262 within the City of Roseville. 263 Page 6 of 19