My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0326
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:39 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 9:59:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/26/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 26, 2007 <br />Page 26 <br /> <br />cord, and that neighborhood opposition alone was not upheld by the courts <br />as rationale for City Council denial. <br /> <br />Mr. Reiling expressed astonishment that the daycare was not concerned on <br />behalf of the children and their exposure to additional vehicle emissions. <br />Mr. Reiling opined that the City Council had a special obligation to take care <br />of people in the community and watch out for their welfare. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust clarified that she was not seeking an argument, but <br />noted her reliance on all considerations, citizen concerns, and balancing all <br />interests for the overall, long-term benefit of the City. Councilmember Pust <br />read the letter verbatim, so as not to paraphrase the intent. Councilmember <br />Pust opined that she needed to consider all evidence in record, and sought to <br />clarify the daycare director's response so that it was accurately stated in the <br />record. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust further addressed her definition of "contiguous proper- <br />ties," as noted by Councilmember Ihlan, and opined that, while properties <br />across the street would no-doubt be impacted, they could not be considered <br />as contiguous properties. Councilmember Pust observed that, with regard to <br />the hours of operation of the drive-thm, the traffic generated by the daycare <br />was already impacting the neighborhood during early morning hours. Coun- <br />cilmember Pust commended Mr. Reiling on his research; however, noted <br />that his projections and findings were consistent with those provided by the <br />RLK traffic study; and concurred with Councilmember Roe's observations <br />that traffic is an issue already, whether or not the drive-thm is approved. <br /> <br />Mr. Reiling strongly disagreed with Councilmember Roe and Mayor Klaus- <br />ing, and alleged that they were trivializing the situation. Mr. Reiling refer- <br />enced the recent agreement the Mayor signed supporting reductions in <br />global warming and local efforts to seek reductions; and opined that the <br />Mayor should abide by the agreement he had signed. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing allowed Ms. Reiling to read a statement summarizing a <br />study done by the University of Southern California and their findings of <br />significant lung impairment to a study group of 3,600 children during a 13 <br />year study; and purported impacts of living in communities with exposure to <br />freeways. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.