My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0423
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0423
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:46:08 AM
Creation date
5/15/2007 9:46:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/23/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting Minutes <br />Monday, April 23, 2007 <br />Page 32 <br /> <br />Council consensus was to adhere consistently to policy in not relying <br />on reserves for annual budget expenses. <br /> <br />City Manager Malinen clarified that this policy, by his interpretation <br />and application, would direct staff to do an analysis and projection of <br />revenue, with the understanding that they had to work within revenue <br />projections. Mr. Malinen emphasized that this would drive proposed <br />expenditures, and dictate what staff initially presented to the City <br />Council as the City Manager's recommended budget for 2008; ob- <br />serving that the recommended budget would be balanced in accor- <br />dance with that policy, whatever implications may be created. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing observed that corrective action may not be able to be <br />taken in one fell swoop; but consistent with City policy, funding <br />mechanisms should be returned to replace all capital assets in an or- <br />derly way. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe questioned if it was the intent to include re- <br />placement of City Hall buildings, or more for ongoing major mainte- <br />nance (i.e., roof replacement, HV AC replacement, etc.). <br /> <br />Mr. Miller advised that this policy looked at all assets, including City <br />buildings; however, he suggested that the City Council look at it for <br />an all-inclusive basis for infrastructure needs (i.e., water, street, build- <br />ings) to the extent funding was evident and providing a comfort level <br />for Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe suggested that there may be policy reasons not to <br />consider replacement of buildings (i.e., City Hall) in sinking funds, <br />and approach voters for a bond referendum, on a case by case basis, <br />for their direction, rather then collecting taxpayer money for a number <br />of years prior to such expenditure. Councilmember Roe asked, and <br />Councilmembers concurred, that staff provide rationale for each op- <br />tion to allow the Council to make a determination on the appropriate <br />level of funding. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included complementing policies for the Capital <br />Improvement Plan (CIP) policy and the operating budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.