My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0423
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0423
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:46:08 AM
Creation date
5/15/2007 9:46:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/23/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Couucil Meeting Minutes <br />Monday, April 23, 2007 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />of this housing facility. Mr. Miller noted that the applicant wished to <br />address the City Council with additional information. <br /> <br />The applicant, Mr. Terry McMillis, noted that he represented his part- <br />ner Mike Swenson and their development partnership entitled, Gar- <br />dens East Limited Partnership. Mr. McMillis advised Councilmem- <br />bers that their adoption of the proposed ordinance, as prepared by the <br />City's Bond Counsel, Briggs and Morgan, would allow the partner- <br />ship to seek sound financing for the proposed project, and require a <br />definite commitment by their partnership of $50,000 to secure the <br />purchase agreement for the property prior to the Public Hearing being <br />held. Mr. McMillis asked that the City Council address any potential <br />misgivings they may have prior to that financial commitment, and ex- <br />pressed his willingness to address any questions or concerns of the <br />City Council at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. McMillis advised that the property had been constructed in 1966, <br />and currently provided an affordable housing option in the City of <br />Roseville, housing retired and/or young working people. Mr. McMil- <br />lis opined that the property represented a decent, safe housing option, <br />but advised that it needed updating and that the developers anticipated <br />expending $980,000 total in renovations, at approximately $10,000 <br />per unit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the intent of the developer and guar- <br />antee to the City that the project would remain affordable housing, if <br />the City were to grant issuing revenue bonds. <br /> <br />Mr. McMillis advised that the federal government housing and tax <br />policy required strict land use restrictions for bond financing, and ad- <br />herence to affordable housing based on 30% of a tenant's income; <br />with additional documentation provided by the City's Bond Counsel <br />and the developer prior to actual issuance, and requiring City Council <br />approval. Mr. McMillis noted that the land use stays with the land <br />and would survive any sale of the property, and that under Internal <br />Revenue Service (IRS) code, if the developer sold the property before <br />15 years, they would have to post a bond, and provided built-in safe- <br />guards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.