My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-04-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-04-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2012 11:39:28 AM
Creation date
6/28/2012 11:39:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/24/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
available or vacant and often parking lot versus green space took the place of the <br /> land not being developed immediately. <br /> Chair Vanderwall provided another example in Little Canada on Rice Street <br /> where a building went up and still had only one (1) tenant, even though built with <br /> a future intent. However, Chair Vanderwall noted that some vacancies were due <br /> to consequences of the market. <br /> In Section 1004.06 (Regional Business), Section E.1, Member Gjerdingen opined <br /> that he would prefer more on-street parking creating a buffer between the <br /> sidewalk and street, or shared space that would prove beneficial. <br /> Chair Vanderwall provided another example of his recent visit to Washington, <br /> D.C. and parking and transit options there; as well as the results of our changing <br /> society. <br /> In Section 1005.07 (page 45 of the CMU Zoning Section), Member Gjerdingen <br /> noted the many lots in Twin Lakes marked with "flexible" frontage, and opined <br /> that CMU zoning should be comparable to the Regional Business Zoning District; <br /> with the CMU area having more restrictions, since it appeared that the City had <br /> given up a lot of control. <br /> Chair Vanderwall suggested that the flexibility may be related to the type of <br /> businesses that was trying to be attracted, with different criteria for an office <br /> building versus retail; as well as more flexibility for tenants and customers or <br /> clients, based on the type of business. Chair Vanderwall suggested that this may <br /> be part of the rationale for allowing that flexibility, to encourage a broader range <br /> of uses, or at least to not place undue restrictions or regulations on those uses <br /> unless applicable. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that the Zoning Districts had been developed with <br /> significant business community input, respecting their property rights, while at the <br /> same time achieving the long-term goals of the City for green space and green <br /> corridors. Mr. Schwartz advised that the results of those discussions had provided <br /> this language; and as properties developed, this document would attempt to <br /> achieve those long-term goals. <br /> Chair Vanderwall thanked staff for providing the documents; opining that he <br /> intended to keep them for future reference for PWETC-related interests and <br /> discussions. <br /> At the request of Member Felice, Mr. Schwartz advised that there had been some <br /> resistance in the City's attempt to promote this type of development, while also <br /> attempting to recognize the market and meet customer base concerns of <br /> developers, through some compromises. <br /> Page 13 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.