My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0514
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:46:24 AM
Creation date
5/25/2007 9:20:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/14/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />& <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Single-Family Residential <br />Lot Split Study <br /> <br />Presentation Overview <br /> <br /> <br />. Background <br />. Study Scope <br />. Process and Timeline <br />. Citizens Advisory Group <br />. Public Participation and Input <br />. Context Issues <br />. Recommendations <br /> <br />Rre$entation of Recommendations <br /> <br />Presentation and Discussion: <br />City Council <br /> <br />May 14, 2007 <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Study Scope <br /> <br />. Interim ordinance passed January 8 prohibiting the <br />subdivision ofsingle-family resi.dential parcels for 90 <br />days to allow time to study this issue <br /> <br />Ordinance took effect on January 30 <br /> <br />. City Council created the Citizens Advisory Group on <br />February 26 <br /> <br />. The appropriate dimensions (width, depth and area) <br />of a single-family lot; <br /> <br />- Members of the Planning Commission <br />- Four at-large members appointed <br />Moratorium ended on April 30 <br /> <br />Whether the appropriate dimensions of a single- <br />family lot should be a uniform standard throughout <br />the community or should vary to reflect other single- <br />family lots in its proximity - and any equity issues that <br />would result from varying lot standards; <br /> <br /> <br />Study. Scope <br /> <br />StudyScope <br /> <br />. The appropriate shape of single-family lots <br />(pqrticularlythe: characteristics of front yard lot line.s); <br /> <br />. Whether each single-family lot created through a <br />public actiorHhould be servecll:>Y Clpublic street ("r <br />would a private street suffice?); <br /> <br />. Whether to revise or create other single-family lot <br />standards (including, but not limited to: tree <br />preservation and replacement; open space <br />preservation, designating steep slopes as un buildable; <br />etc.); <br /> <br />. Whether any actions resulting in an increased lot size <br />(and decreased housing density) in some instances or <br />areas should be balanced by subsequent actions <br />resulting in decreased lot size (and increased housing <br />de"sIties) in other areas; <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.