My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0611
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2007 8:25:06 AM
Creation date
6/21/2007 11:30:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/11/2007
Meeting Type
Continued
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Elf1ch HA <br />(;)/!J(D <br /> <br />(."(+ <br />~) v ! <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />Community Development Department <br /> <br /> <br />Memo <br /> <br />To: City Council Members <br />William J. Malinen, City Manager <br /> <br />From: Jamie Radel, Economic Development Associate <br />John Stark, Community Development Director <br /> <br />cc: Tam McGehee <br /> <br />Date: June 8, 2007 <br /> <br />Re: Analysis of Alternative Lot Split Policy Recommendations <br /> <br />At the May 14,2007 Stndy Session, the Single-Family Residential Lot Split Advisory Group <br />presented t..'1e ontcomes and recommendations of the Single-Family Residential Lot Split <br />Stndy to the City Council. The City Council had appointed this group to stndy issues related to <br />single-family residential lot splits and subdivisions during the enactment of an interim <br />ordinance prohibiting these actions from taking place. The purpose of the group's presentation <br />was to report back to the City Council on its findings. (The Advisory Group's <br />recommendations are attached to this memorandum.) <br /> <br />At the conclusion of the stndy session, Ms. Tam McGehee, a Roseville resident, presented the <br />City Council with an alternative set of recommendations regarding lot split policies and <br />expressed that she had circulated a petition within the community and obtained a numher of <br />signatures supporting these recommendations. Ms. McGehee did not provide the Council with <br />a copy of the signatures at that time, but ultimately did provide them at a subsequent meeting. <br /> <br />The petition identifies four recommendations (McGehee, 2007): <br /> <br />1. As of July 1,2007, all R-1 platted lots within Roseville are declared legal, <br />regardless of size, placement, lot lines, or any other aspects that would <br />render them "non-conforming" under current policies. <br /> <br />2. Any R -1 lot platted as single-family and that has not yet been developed <br />may be developed with a single-family residence that conforms to <br />Roseville building code. <br /> <br />3. No R -1 single-family platted lot may be divided or subdivided without <br />notice (1,000 fret in all directions)[,] public hearings before the Planning <br />Commission and City Council and subsequent approval of the proposal by <br />the City CounciL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.