Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. Lots created by an approved division of an R-l platted lot can be no <br />smaller than the average lot size of all contiguous lots (those sharing a <br />common boundmy with the original lot) and no smaller than the current <br />standard lot size of 11,000 sf For example, John and Mary Doe have a <br />45,000 sflot. T71e three continuous lots (right, left, and rear) are 20,000, <br />12,000, and 30,000 square feet respectively with an average of20, 666 sf <br />John and Mmy may divide their lot, but they may only divide it into two <br />lots because the remaining 24,334 sflot cannot be made smaller. <br /> <br />Community Development staff has reviewed these recommendations and has discussed them <br />with the City's attorney. The following narrative is an analysis of each ofthese <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />1. Declare all single-family lots legal on a set date <br /> <br />The City ofRoseville fIrst enacted a zoning ordinance on May 21, 1959, with regulations that <br />required lots zoned R-l Single-Family Residential to have 11,000 square feet in area, an 85- <br />foot width, and lID-foot depth. Many lots platted prior to this date did not meet the <br />requirements set forward by this code, which made them all nonconforming, pre-existing lots. <br />The Zarling Code does not callout or have regulation on nonconforming, pre-existing lots; <br />however, there are implicit regulations for non-conforming, pre-existing single-family <br />residential lots within Section 1012 General Requirements. Section 1012.0I(B) states: "a <br />platted lot or parcel ofland of record on May 21, 1959, which does not meet the requirements <br />of this Code as to area, width or open space may be utilized for single-family residential <br />dwelling purposes provided the measurements of such area, width or open space are within <br />seventy percent of the requirements of this code." Essentially, this section grants "legal <br />nonconfonnity" to these pre-May 1959 lots, allowing a house to be built on them as long as <br />they are within seventy percent oflot miuimums, which is 7,700 square feet in area, 59.5 feet <br />in width, and 77 feet in depth. <br /> <br />The Single-Family Residential Lot Split Advisory Group spent siguificant time discussing the <br />issue of pre- and post-May 1959 lots. Ultimately the group recommended to the City Council <br />that instead of this quasi overlay district that currently exists in the Code for pre-May 1959 lots <br />that the Council considers creating both a small lot zoning district and an overlay zoning <br />district. The zoning district would allow for consolidation or simplifIcation of subdivision <br />standards while the overlay zoning district would maintain the legally non-conforming status <br />of the pre-May 1959 lots. <br /> <br />In the staff analysis of this recommendation, the proposal to declare all single-family lots legal <br />on a set date seems an unconventional zoning practice. In Roseville, there are several areas <br />where platted lots are quite narrow (25 feet wide). These are legally platted lots where the <br />owners have purchased one or more lot to create a buildable parcel without replatting these <br />parcels. Section IOI2.0I(e) states: <br /> <br />. Page 2 <br /> <br />Analysis of Alternative Recommendations <br />