My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0709_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0709_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:46:09 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AttachmentB <br />Administrative Appeal by SWARN <br />(Solidarity of West Area of Roseville Neighbors) <br />Regarding the <br />As to the Compliance of the Wal-Mart proposal with Roseville <br />Policies, Plans, and Zoning Ordinance <br />(Prepared June 30, 2012 for Roseville City Council members and the general public by <br />the Strategies Committee of Solidarity of West Area Roseville Neighbors (SWARN)) <br />I: <br />NTRODUCTION <br />This appeal was drafted by the SWARN Strategies Committee which <br />a steering committee for this Roseville neighborhood association <br />we represent over 67 households in the western area of Roseville <br />Committee members signing this Appeal are a quorum of the commit <br />all property owners residing in Roseville. <br />Below you will find our concerns and issues regarding the propos <br />development and its compliance with City policies and the requir <br />Zoning Ordinance. This appeal was developed by Roseville residents without <br />legal consultation and in words which we hope convey our frustra <br />system which requires residents to appeal a decision by city emp <br />for our elected officials to make a decision which we had naivel <br />only theirs to make. <br />We also submit this appeal in the hope that our elected official <br />as an honest and candid articulation of issues which many reside <br />have not up to now sufficiently considered, explained, or justif <br />We do not speak for all the people of Roseville, we speak for ou <br />members. And we speak from our experience as Roseville resident <br />been engaged in this community, understand that all of us <br />have rights and responsibilities, and that to appeal a staff determination is not to <br />suggest improper motivation or malfeasance on their part. <br />We also recognize, however, that this appeal is in itself recogn <br />process could and should be improved so that future residents do <br />have recourse to legal representation, and can feel confident th <br />and perceptions will be acknowledged, respected, and responded t <br />elected officials and public employees. We regret that it took a letter from a high- <br />powered law firm serving t <br />justification from city staff when similar requests from residen <br />payers went unanswered. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />SWARN Appeal--July 2, 2012 <br />1 <br />Page1of18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.