Laserfiche WebLink
AttachmentB <br />GA: <br />ROUNDS FOR PPEAL <br />1)Basis for Appeal Includes the Complete Record regarding the Compliance <br />of the Wal-Mart development with City of Roseville Policies, Plans, and <br />Regulations <br />We find it necessary to state that a determination of compliance <br />before the request of Walmart (Attorney Susan Steinwall letter of June 8, 2012) <br />and the response from the Community Development Department dated <br />stst <br />21.) The June 21 Community Development Letter is just the last of several <br />statements of compliance issued by city staff, and for the recor <br />st <br />therefore restricting ourselves to the June 21 determination signed by <br />Community Development Director Pat Trudgeon and City Planner Tho <br />Paschke. In fact several residents requested a similar explanation as to <br />Wal-Mart proposal was in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan <br />st <br />February 1 Planning Commission meeting, but their request was ignored. <br /> <br />We are basing our appeal on the various communications to the Co <br />City Attorney beginning with City Attorney Charles Bartholdi let <br />and the reports and recommendations made by staff beginning with th <br />September 26, 2011, Request for Council Action on Approving a Tw <br />Overlay District and continuing throughout this review process, <br />st <br />February 1 public hearing held by the Planning Commission and extending <br />st <br />through the May 21 City Council meeting on the plat subdivision and the public <br />comments offered at that time. , <br />st <br />At the February 1 Planning Commission public hearing several residents <br />1 <br />presented their concerns that the Planning first <br />analysis failed to present any rationale as to how the Wal-Mart proposal met <br />more than several of the goals and objectives of the Roseville Comprehensive <br />Plan. In fact one resident asked that the Commission send the staff <br />recommendation back to the Community Development Department with the <br />2 <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />At that meeting the Planning Staff presented their determination that the Wal- <br />Mart proposal was in compliance with the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Note the following statements excerpted from the February 1, 2012, staff <br />3 <br />report: <br />Planning Division staff believes that the proposed development is consistent <br />wit other citywide, non-transportation- <br /> <br />1 <br /> Cr. February 1, 2012, Minutes of the Roseville Planning Commission, including all attachements <br />2 <br /> Remarks of Roseville Resident Gary Grefenberg as distributed to Planning Commission February 1, 2012 <br />3 <br /> Staff Report dated <br />SWARN Appeal--July 2, 2012 <br />2 <br />Page2of18 <br /> <br />