Laserfiche WebLink
AttachmentF <br />process; and was required to use the same process throughout the City of Roseville for any project or <br />310 <br />application coming forward, in order to avoid preferential treatment. Mr. Paschke reiterated that it was <br />311 <br />staff’s charge to enforce and implement the requirements within the Zoning Ordinance. <br />312 <br />Ms. Ramalingam suggested that staff provide the City Council with the public comments and concerns <br />313 <br />received related to this proposal; with Mr. Paschke assured her that the City Council would receive <br />314 <br />minutes of tonight’s meeting so they would be aware of public sentiment. <br />315 <br />In response to repeated cell phone interruptions during tonight’s meeting, Ms. Ramalingam asked that <br />316 <br />the Planning Commission or the City Council itself make a policy statement or accommodation to <br />317 <br />address such interruptions during public speaking, noting the difficulty in following procedures and in <br />318 <br />hearing discussions due to those distractions. <br />319 <br />For the benefit of the public and listening audience, Member Gisselquist provided examples of issues <br />320 <br />that were heard by the Planning Commission (e.g. pawn shop request near Snelling Avenue as a <br />321 <br />Conditional Use based on zoning considerations) and other uses that are on the list of allowed uses (e.g. <br />322 <br />Source Comic Books at the same location) that do not come before the Commission since they are <br />323 <br />allowed uses. Member Gisselquist noted that, as long as the use met zoning requirements at a specific <br />324 <br />development site, there was less public involvement that occurred. <br />325 <br />Member Strohmeier opined that City Code language related to Preliminary Plat approval (Chapter <br />326 <br />1102.03) seemed to be broad. However, the health, welfare and general safety of citizens would appear <br />327 <br />to be applicable in one or more of those categories with some of the concerns being raised by citizens. <br />328 <br />Member Strohmeier suggested that, considering that broad language, perhaps the Commission’s hands <br />329 <br />were not as tied as indicated. <br />330 <br />Mr. Paschke responded that the language would only affect how the Subdivision Ordinance regulated or <br />331 <br />applied to this particular property, stating that the City’s ordinances foster those things, and that the <br />332 <br />Subdivision Ordinance was created to look out for those things and how land divisions were required in <br />333 <br />Roseville through easements, lot sizes, etc. and meeting certain requirements within the Zoning <br />334 <br />Ordinance such as for residential lots with specific sizes in certain zoning classifications. Mr. Paschke <br />335 <br />advised that those topics would be germane to analyze Subdivision Zoning specific to land divisions, not <br />336 <br />uses on the land, since other regulations govern the requirements of those specific uses. <br />337 <br />Mr. Paschke noted that City Attorney Mark Gaughan was present and could expand on that <br />338 <br />interpretation if he found it incorrect. <br />339 <br />Rick Poeschl, 2220 Midland Grove Road <br />340 <br />As a Roseville resident since 1968, Mr. Poeschl agreed with the comments heard during public comment <br />341 <br />as well as those expressed by Member Strohmeier that if more residents had known about the Wal-Mart <br />342 <br />plans, there would have been a much larger crowd in attendance tonight. Mr. Poeschl advised that he <br />343 <br />had only heard about the Public Hearing from a neighbor and fellow resident at Midland <br />344 <br />Condominiums; who had also mentioned that Roseville currently had more retail per capita that <br />345 <br />Bloomington, MN with their much larger population. <br />346 <br />Mr. Poeschl noted that Mr. Grefenberg had highlighted and displayed on the overhead, several sections <br />347 <br />of the Comprehensive Plan’s goals and policies that seemed inconsistent; and reiterated that if more <br />348 <br />people had known about tonight’s meeting, they would have provided more feedback. While not clearly <br />349 <br />understanding staff’s responsibility to follow the language of the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Poeschl <br />350 <br />opined that more neighbors should get involved. <br />351 <br />Mr. Poeschl stated that he was opposed to the proposed Wal-Mart, and didn’t want a big box store in <br />352 <br />Roseville, including a Wal-Mart. <br />353 <br />Page8of14 <br /> <br />