2012_0709_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AttachmentF were based on a vacant piece of land on which a viable company was being proposed. Member Lester 534 opined that Wal-Mart was a stable company; and further opined that the Comprehensive Plan supported 535 such a retail use; and the need was evident for bringing in an initial development to further future 536 development of the area. Member Lester advised that he supported the proposal and would support it. 537 Member Gisselquist thanked the public for their comments. Member Gisselquist advised that the 538 Preliminary Plat portion of the request was an easy decision; basically assembling parcels of land for a 539 proposed use, and it made sense to approve that request. 540 However, Member Gisselquist advised that he struggled with disposal of the land when applying it to 541 the Comprehensive Plan until he reviewed the Twin Lakes Master Plan on line and reviewed that 542 language. In referring back to previous discussions about a proposed Costco, Member Gisselquist 543 opined that it appeared they had been chased out as the big box “bogey man.” 544 Member Gisselquist advised that he would support the Preliminary Plat and land disposal. 545 In recognizing that the big box use served as the elephant in the room and remained present, Member 546 Gisselquist opined that it had nothing to do with the request before the Commission; but assured that the 547 Commission had heard the concerns expressed by those speaking tonight; and noted that Member 548 Boguszewski had shared considerations on the other side of the issue as well. 549 Member Gisselquist stated that one part of being a Planning Commissioner was that he didn’t like 550 hearing criticisms of those seeking to come into the community. As a former “Richfield guy,” Member 551 Gisselquist advised that he took comments personally when they dished his former neighborhood. After 552 thirty (30) years, Member Gisselquist opined that it was time to do something in the Twin Lakes area, 553 referencing his personal observations when last biking in the area of four foot (4’) grass growing 554 through broken asphalt, vacant spaces, and graffiti abounding. Member Gisselquist assured residents 555 that there was already a good police presence in the area based on his experience he shared as an 556 example. Member Gisselquist opined that the area was currently a wasteland and he supported someone 557 developing it; and while it will continue to be controversial, it was the right thing to do. 558 Member Strohmeier thanked the public for their comments; and respectfully disagreed with other 559 commissioners that the Commission’s hands were tied regarding the Plat, opining that this was a major 560 planning decision and a big deal. Member Strohmeier referenced various guiding documents showing 561 that big box retail is not something that will benefit a community, including the Twin Lakes Master 562 Plan, as well as sections of the Comprehensive Plan as displayed by Mr. Grefenberg and his comments, 563 some of which he may disagree with. However, Member Strohmeier did recognize the numerous 564 inconsistencies pointed out by Mr. Grefenberg. Member Strohmeier opined that he would agree with the 565 Statement of Purpose for Commercial Mixed Use Districts, and the lack of a pedestrian, rather than 566 vehicle-centered use. Member Strohmeier opined that this was simply one more way to add to the 567 community’s frustration in their apparent lack of a role in a role in local government, and expressed his 568 disappointment in the current public process. Member Strohmeier advised that he would be voting in 569 opposition to both requested actions. 570 Chair Boerigter thanked the public for their comments, and noted his rationale in allowing for some 571 flexibility with the broad-based comments even when outside the specific scope being considered 572 tonight; recognizing that this was a Public Hearing needing to allow a forum for those public comments. 573 However, Chair Boerigter emphasized that the Commission’s decision-making needed to focus on the 574 limited scope of the Preliminary Plat and city-owned property disposal. 575 Chair Boerigter opined that he didn’t personally think this was outside the Comprehensive Plan, but that 576 it actually fit with the Comprehensive Plan and work done by the City over the last 5-6 years as a 577 Planning Commission and City Council to guide Twin Lakes development. 578 Page13of14