2012_0709_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AttachmentF Chair Boerigter further opined that to have a perception that Roseville residents didn’t have a voice in 579 this was quite ludicrous since the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area had been a topic of discussion for 580 years; and as late as last fall, the Planning Commission and City Council held numerous and substantive 581 discussions on the Zoning Code, the Twin Lakes Regulating Map, and other issues, and the allowed uses 582 in Twin Lakes, all of which were consistent with this proposal. Chair Boerigter suggested that, to think 583 that a big box retailer may not develop in the Twin Lakes area was hard to imagine, when all that was 584 required was to listen to discussions to understand that retail was a permitted use and it may include a 585 large scale retailer. 586 Chair Boerigter stated that a review of the current Zoning Code would serve to dictate what was 587 consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and as pointed out by staff, the Zoning Code was amended to 588 make it consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, along with development of the Regulating Map 589 as the governing document to control development in the Twin Lakes area consistent with that 590 Comprehensive Plan. Chair Boerigter opined that it was important to take the overall picture into 591 consideration and what goes into the development area as a whole, and what the overarching guidance 592 of the Comprehensive Plan indicated, rather than picking out bits and pieces. Chair Boerigter expressed 593 his confidence that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code were both very specific on the governance 594 of what could or could not occur in developing and/or redeveloping the Twin Lakes Redevelopment 595 Area. 596 Based on his review of these documents, Chair Boerigter opined that the Preliminary Plat and request 597 for land disposition both met City Code requirements, and advised that he would support both. 598 MOTION 599 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Lester, to RECOMMEND TO THE CITY 600 COUNCIL approval of the proposed PRELIMINARY PLAT of the land area bounded by County 601 Road C, Cleveland Avenue, Twin Lakes Parkway, and Prior Avenue; based on the comments and 602 findings of Sections 4-7, and the conditions recommended in Section 8 of the staff report dated 603 February 1, 2012. 604 Ayes: 5 605 Nays: 1 (Strohmeier) 606 Motion carried. 607 MOTION 608 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Gisselquist, indicating the Commission’s 609 determination that the proposed transfer of ownership of land area specified in the Preliminary 610 Plat is in compliance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; based on the comments and findings of 611 Section 4-7 of the staff report dated February 1, 2012. 612 Ayes: 5 613 Nays: 1 (Strohmeier) 614 Motion carried. 615 Chair Boerigter noted the anticipated City Council action on this item is scheduled for February 27, 616 2012. 617 Page14of14