2012_0709_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AttachmentH variable, and would depend on the specific community, bus routes, and a store’s proximity to the inner 401 core. 402 Councilmember Johnson asked if the expansion of the Super Target in Roseville had caused police calls 403 to spike as well, Chief Mathwig responded that there had been no significant spike. 404 Councilmember Johnson questioned what Chief Mathwig’s opinion was on the impact of calls if Target 405 had chosen to go with a 24-hour operation. 406 Chief Mathwig responded that they would have probably had the potential to be higher, with any such 407 24 hour operation versus a 12 hour operation creating the probability of more calls. 408 Surface Parking/Parking Lot Design 409 At the request of Mayor Roe regarding the question on whether the proposed design met parking 410 regulations, Mr. Trudgeon advised that City Code was referenced for the design by the developer and 411 review of the design by staff for Community Business District zoning restrictions, and met those 412 requirements. Mr. Trudgeon clarified that Community Business District zoning had a different standard 413 that that erroneously cited. 414 While staff did not have the information available, Councilmember Willmus questioned the approximate 415 amount of existing office space square footage in Twin Lakes. Councilmember Willmus explained his 416 rationale in asking the question based on whether or not this 160,000 square foot retail center would 417 skew the overall use within Twin Lakes. 418 Due Process Concerns with Revisions to the Development Agreement 419 Mayor Roe asked that staff respond to concerns regarding due process with revisions provided by staff 420 this afternoon related to the Development Agreement. 421 Mr. Trudgeon advised that financial information had been included in the information released with the 422 draft Development Agreement included as part of the agenda packet materials, and had not been 423 changed with the revisions released today. As previously noted in staff’s presentation, the revisions 424 were minor in nature and basically consisted of typographical and grammatical corrections, and 425 additional exhibits as supporting documents referenced in the body of the Agreement. Mr. Trudgeon 426 advised that the summary of the Development Agreement and a significant portion of the exhibits were 427 included in the packet available and/or distributed last Thursday. 428 Councilmember Pust noted that the total dollars were included, just not the detailed breakdown. 429 At approximately 9:59 pm, Johnson moved, Willmus seconded, extending the meeting curfew to 10:30 430 pm. 431 Roll Call 432 Ayes: Pust; Willmus; McGehee; Johnson; and Roe. 433 Nays: None. 434 Mayor Roe deferred response to the office versus retail portion until the City Council discussion. 435 Traffic Mitigation at Fairview Avenue and County Road D 436 Mayor Roe asked City Engineer Bloom to respond to the comment that this development did not trigger 437 mitigation for the Fairview Avenue and County Road D intersection and that its service level would be 438 maintained at level “f.” 439 Ms. Bloom responded that, while not having that information available at this time, she could verify that 440 there was no change indicated at that intersection. Ms. Bloom noted that there were a number of 441 intersections within the community currently rated at “d” or “f” service levels today; and the Wal-Mart 442 development did not trigger any additional mitigation based on projected impacts to the intersection. 443 Page10of14