My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0709_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0709_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:46:09 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AttachmentH <br />Ms. Bloom referenced a letter addressed to her from MnDOT dated April 12, 2012, addressing the <br />444 <br />projected 6,000 vehicles per hour to Wal-Mart. Quoting directly from that correspondence, Ms. Bloom <br />445 <br />noted that I-35W carried greater than 100,000 trips daily. Ms. Bloom summarized that the increased <br />446 <br />traffic projected for the future was 6,000 vehicles per hour for northbound I-35W some portion of which <br />447 <br />may utilize the interchange, but clarified that they would not all be accessing the Wal-Mart development <br />448 <br />specifically. <br />449 <br />Ms. Bloom displayed a map showing the Twin Lakes Parkway interchange, and proposed interchange <br />450 <br />improvements to address cuing concerns of MnDOT and S.R.F. Consulting, both included as <br />451 <br />attachments to the staff reports as background material, and potential stacking concerns impacting I- <br />452 <br />35W, creating the required improvement shown in the Development Agreement. <br />453 <br />Regarding the City requirement to make sure access was made available to the Wal-Mart site, Ms. <br />454 <br />Bloom and Mr. Trudgeon were in agreement that they didn’t foresee a delay in providing permanent <br />455 <br />access, without the need to provide a temporary means. However, Ms. Bloom advised that the City <br />456 <br />would be obligated to provide access, whether temporary or permanent in accordance with the terms of <br />457 <br />the Development Agreement. At the request of Mayor Roe regarding public comment on who would <br />458 <br />pay for the rest of the cost of the I-35W improvements, Ms. Bloom advised that, while that remains to be <br />459 <br />determined, grant funds and Chapter 429 assessments to benefitting property owners were both options. <br />460 <br />Ms. Bloom noted that the City’s request for grant funds had been scored very favorably, but was still not <br />461 <br />awarded, and expressed cautious optimism that funding would be made available, but not yet in place. <br />462 <br />Current level of retail in Roseville and Potential Impacts for Wal-Mart <br />463 <br />At the invitation of Mayor Roe, Ms. Steinwall responded that, while she was not privy to Wal-Mart’s <br />464 <br />business plan, market research had found that Roseville citizens were shopping at Wal-Mart. Ms. <br />465 <br />Steinwall noted that her client was obviously confident that there were unfilled retail needs in the <br />466 <br />community, and they recognized Roseville as a terrific community and were excited to become part of <br />467 <br />that community. Ms. Steinwall advised that trends supported the fact that the more retail available in an <br />468 <br />area, the better the market was for everyone; and advised there was no concern by Wal-Mart with <br />469 <br />existing retail in Roseville. <br />470 <br />Spacing of Stores/Potential Closures <br />471 <br />At the invitation of Mayor Roe, Ms. Steinwall responded that, while again not privy to her client’s <br />472 <br />business and/or future plans, in observing other big box retailer space throughout the Twin Cities area <br />473 <br />(e.g. Target), there were similarities for locating close to other stores. Whether one store may close due <br />474 <br />to another store being built in Roseville, Ms. Steinwall noted that she was unable to predict the future; <br />475 <br />however, she anticipated that a vast majority of customers will visit this Wal-Mart from within a two (2) <br />476 <br />mile radius. <br />477 <br />Roseville Design Standards/Development Process <br />478 <br />Councilmember Johnson asked Ms. Steinwall if the Wal-Mart development team had found the City of <br />479 <br />Roseville to be more stringent about design and/or architectural standards not normally found in a Wal- <br />480 <br />Mart setting. <br />481 <br />Ms. Steinwall responded with a resounding “yes,” based on the team’s experience, and noted that Wal- <br />482 <br />Mart’s approach was to achieve 100% compliance with the City’s new Zoning Code which had proven <br />483 <br />quite particular about design elements and building orientation, design and parking lot size, and assuring <br />484 <br />that the development was more pedestrian friendly and accessible. However, Ms. Steinwall expressed <br />485 <br />the team’s appreciation for City staff during the process, even while being very, very particular in <br />486 <br />meeting City Code requirements, while at the same time providing the development team with a great <br />487 <br />abundance of details and requirements. <br />488 <br />Page11of14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.