My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0709_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0709_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:46:09 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 7/09/2012 <br />Item No.: 13.a <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Neighborhood Traffic Management Program <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />Staff presented the draft Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (TMP) to the City Council at the <br />2 <br />April 16 Worksession. Since that meeting staff has been working on addressing the questions that the <br />3 <br />City Council raised during the discussion. Attached is a draft plan with proposed changes. The changes <br />4 <br />incorporate language that clarifies the intent of the program, required neighborhood support, and <br />5 <br />funding. Staff will discuss the changes and address questions at the meeting. <br />6 <br />Two neighborhood traffic management requests were discussed by the City Council in 2011. Staff <br />7 <br />would like to move forward with these projects as pilot projects for the new TMP. What follows is the <br />8 <br />background and proposed next steps for each neighborhood. <br />9 <br />Wheeler Avenue: In 2011 the City Council received a petition from the residents on Wheeler Avenue <br />10 <br />and Shorewood Lane with a request to close off Wheeler Avenue at County Road D. The intent of this <br />11 <br />request was to address the neighborhood’s cut through traffic concerns. The petition of support was <br />12 <br />from 97% of the Benefitted Area, exceeding the TMP’s threshold of 65% support. The temporary <br />13 <br />closure was installed last summer. Staff proposes to take this request to Step 8- Strategy Evaluation. <br />14 <br />The next step would be for the City Council to order the preparation of a feasibility report. Staff would <br />15 <br />then identify the costs associated with making the measure permanent, provide this information to the <br />16 <br />Benefitted Area and bring back to the City Council for a Public Hearing. <br />17 <br />Dale Street: As part of the public information process for the Dale Street reconstruction project, <br />18 <br />residents brought up concerns about traffic. The traffic volume, while high for typical residential <br />19 <br />streets, is low for a collector road. Traffic speed is the primary source of their concern. The road is <br />20 <br />signed 30 mph. As indicated by the traffic counts, the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph. As a part of the <br />21 <br />approval process, staff recommended that this project include the installation of two speed tables in the <br />22 <br />corridor one to the north of Iona Lane, the second to the south of Iona Lane. <br />23 <br />The discussion of the installation of the speed tables was limited to the Benefitted Area; the people that <br />24 <br />live on Dale Street. We did not solicit feedback from the Affected Area; the property owners on the <br />25 <br />streets that could be negatively impacted by traffic changes. Staff recommends that before we install <br />26 <br />temporary speed tables on Dale Street to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy, that we solicit <br />27 <br />additional feedback, as described in Step 5- Receive Neighborhood Feedback. <br />28 <br />PO <br />OLICYBJECTIVE <br />29 <br />This document was developed to guide city staff and inform citizens about the processes and procedures <br />30 <br />for implementing traffic management strategies on local streets to address documented existing traffic <br />31 <br />concerns such as excessive vehicle speeds, high volumes of non-local through traffic, vehicle crashes in <br />32 <br />neighborhoods, and alleviate conflicts between motorized and non-motorized users. The document <br />33 <br />includes a summary of the City of Roseville's Policies for the Traffic Management Program, background <br />34 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.