2012_0709_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AttachmentA 211 broader discussion could be held at the City Council level for them to set a policy in their Zoning 212 Ordinance. Mr. Paschke noted that non-profits come and go; the building could exchange hands; it could 213 be on or off the tax rolls; but any or all of those situations were not related to zoning. Mr. Paschke 214 recognized the overall implications of tax burdens; however, reiterated that the broader issue would not 215 be solidified through zoning, or who owned the building or who paid or didn’t pay taxes. With all due 216 respect, Mr. Paschke reiterated that this was not a concern of the Planning Commission related to this 217 specific request. 218 Member Strohmeier, respectful of Mr. Paschke note of caution; opined that the Commission was being 219 asked to turn around zoning for this applicant, a non-profit, to buy an office building and remove it from 220 the tax rolls. By adding this use, Member Strohmeier concurred that there would be no change to that 221 status; however, the Commission would be opening up the City for a similar use in the community allowed 222 more specifically in the Zoning Ordinance. 223 Vice Chair Gisselquist and Mr. Paschke in turn reminded Commissioners that Northwestern College 224 already owned this building, and was not purchasing it. 225 Member Boguszewski, respecting Mr. Grefenberg’s concerns, opined that they didn’t apply; since those 226 concerns were related to something changing the function of those occupying the space, while this 227 request didn’t change anything about the character or nature of an activity already occurring. 228 Member Boguszewski opined that the request was for a similar use to that already occurring on site, with 229 no one raising any concern or contention that the current use was in violation of the Comprehensive Plan 230 or nature of what use could happen there; and further opined that therefore, this proposed use should not 231 raise any concerns either. Member Boguszewski opined that this use was not in violation of or not in the 232 spirit of the Comprehensive Plan. While it may not address Mr. Grefenberg’s concerns about the 233 Comprehensive Plan or if the City Council or other bodies were ignoring parts of that Plan in their 234 deliberations, Member Boguszewski offered his support of the proposed use and Text Amendment. 235 Member Olsen opined that this was a change from office space to teaching, essentially expanding the 236 campus, and whether good, bad or indifferent, it still represented a change and raised questions, as 237 expressed by Mr. Grefenberg, in expansion of the Northwestern College campus. From that perspective, 238 and true intended use as a teaching space, not another office space, Member Olsen opined that the use 239 was new and different. 240 At the request of Member Cunningham, Mr. Humphries advised that the College could not afford to build 241 additional facilities on their campus proper. While this may be a consideration at some future point, and 242 allowed under the College’s footprint for their Planned Unit Development (PUD), Mr. Humphries 243 confirmed that the College didn’t have the available resources to proceed with a new facility on campus at 244 this time, thus their request for this option. 245 Member Cunningham noted that here areas of most concern were in the campus appearing to spill out 246 into the community, affecting residents and businesses in those areas. However, Member Cunningham 247 advised that she would probably support this request; but hoped that the City Council considered those 248 implications as well during their deliberations. 249 Vice Chair Gisselquist closed the Public Hearing for File 12-008 at approximately 7:19 p.m. 250 MOTION 251 Member Boguszewski moved, seconded by Member Lester to recommend to the City Council 252 APPROVAL OF THE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT for Lincoln Drive Properties, LLC, a property 253 management subsidiary of Northwestern College, to allow academic classes to be taught in office 254 settings in addition to more traditional campus settings; based on the comments and findings of 255 Sections 4-6 and the recommendations of Section 7 of the staff report dated June 6, 2012. 256 Member Strohmeier opined that this request put people on edge as it was essentially Northwestern 257 College expanding again; and noted the rocky past and controversial issues in the past as well. While not 258 sure of his feelings, Member Strohmeier opined that some of the questions raised needed to be 259 addressed at the City Council level and urged them to flag those issues (e.g. property tax roll status and 260 impacts). Despite the opinions expressed by Member Boguszewski, Member Strohmeier opined that this 261 was a change, and with the location of the building adjacent to Eagle Crest with many seniors walking on 262 Lincoln Drive to parks and shopping, it created concerns. Member Strohmeier advised that he had heard 263 residents from that facility, as well as in the area, express their grave concerns with the continued 264 expansion of Northwestern College and the multiple and negative impacts of the expansion. Member Page5of6