My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2012 1:59:33 PM
Creation date
7/18/2012 1:59:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 18,2012 <br /> Page 12 <br /> sky Management LLC regarding the purchase of land for roads and utilities in <br /> the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area; and authorizing execution of the Agree- <br /> ment by the Mayor and City Manager. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Johnson; Roe; Pust; and McGehee. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> c. Request Rejection and Seek Rebid Approval for Four Contracts within <br /> Package#2 <br /> Fire Chief Tim O'Neill, with some members of the Fire Station Design Team, <br /> provided information on the impacts of the delay in resolution of the pending <br /> litigation. Chief O'Neill advised that they were not recommending award of <br /> any contracts associated with Bid Package#2 at this time. Chief O'Neill further <br /> advised that they were requesting that the City formally reject four of the con- <br /> tracts and authorization to rebid four of the contracts since engineering and ma- <br /> terial changes had been made to reduce the overall estimated amount of the con- <br /> tracts. <br /> Discussion among Councilmembers and the Construction/Design Team includ- <br /> ed potential return on investment for mechanical systems; projected annual en- <br /> ergy costs and/or savings and conservation efforts; the geothermal system and <br /> contract in relationship to the plumbing/heating piping and whether considera- <br /> tion should be given to allocation of the costs more specifically between the fire <br /> station and other portions of the campus; efficiencies or inefficiencies in the <br /> current geothermal system; challenges and more expenses for a stand-alone geo- <br /> thermal system for the fire station, due to the lack of space on that site for addi- <br /> tional wells; and options based on attempting to achieve the LEED silver stand- <br /> ard through immediate or future connections. <br /> Further discussion included impacts to contractual obligations in following rec- <br /> ommendations in the staff report to accept and/or rebid portions of the Bid <br /> Package; a review of Alternative Ten (10) detailed options; and direction to <br /> staff to pursue an alternate action on the geothermal portion of the project at this <br /> time through this requested action. <br /> Fire Chief O'Neill advised that the team would attempt to break out the bids <br /> more and review those challenges in doing so, providing further detail to the <br /> City Council at a future date. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that, if the City couldn't afford to connect the en- <br /> tire campus with a geothermal system at this time, it was realistic to consider <br /> that it wouldn't be feasible in the future either. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.