Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting AND <br /> Board of Adjustments and Appeals <br /> Monday,July 09, 2012 <br /> Page 13 <br /> ever, recognizing those two pending litigation issues, City Attorney <br /> Gaughan noted that their recommended conditions (#9 and#10) would serve <br /> as further protection for the City with the project's proposer having those <br /> conditions addressed per State Code and Environmental Review. However, <br /> City Attorney Gaughan reiterated that it was not the perception of the City <br /> Attorney's Office that it comes into play regarding the Preliminary Plat, and <br /> thus their office did not recommend denial as proposed in the Lightfoot let- <br /> ter. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, in her review of the case law cited by the <br /> City Attorney's Office in their original legal opinion, she had yet to find any- <br /> thing that served to satisfy her of that position on the Preliminary Plat and what <br /> could or could not be considered. Councilmember McGehee further opined that <br /> this created a difference between what the City Attorney's Office proposed, and <br /> what she had found in her research of materials in State Statute, case law, and <br /> the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Handbook. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan apologized that the City Attorney Office's efforts had <br /> not satisfied Councilmember McGehee; however, noting the attempts made to <br /> address those issues raised in past correspondence and the City Attorney Of- <br /> fice's rationale in reaching their conclusions for the City Council as a whole, he <br /> advised that they stood by those conclusions. <br /> Willmus moved, Johnson seconded, approval of the proposed Twin Lakes Se- <br /> cond Addition PRELIMINARY PLAT, pursuant to Title 11 of Roseville City <br /> Code, for the land area bounded by County Road C, Cleveland Avenue, Twin <br /> Lakes Parkway, and Prior Avenue, including the 4,643 square foot rectangle of <br /> land that is the subject of the disposal request; based on the comments and find- <br /> ings of Sections 4-6, and the recommendation of Section 7, of the Request for <br /> Council Action dated July 9, 2012; amended to include the ten (10) conditions <br /> provided by the City Attorney Memorandum dated July 9, 2012 and restated <br /> as follows: <br /> 1) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall enter into a Development <br /> Agreement pertaining to the Plat which is satisfactory to the City. <br /> 2) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall acquire fee simple title to <br /> all of the real property included in the Plat and provide proof that <br /> there are no liens, encumbrances or other parties having an interest in <br /> the Property at the time the Development Agreement and Plat are rec- <br /> orded; or make other arrangements which are satisfactory to the City <br /> to assure that title to the property is satisfactory to the City. <br /> 3) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall either dedicate on the Plat <br /> or otherwise convey all roadway, utility, drainage, and other easements <br /> required by the City. <br />