CC_Minutes_2012_0709 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting AND Board of Adjustments and Appeals Monday,July 09,2012 Page 14 4) The access points to enter and exit the Property being plated shall be at locations approved by the City and any other governmental entity hav- ing jurisdiction over adjacent roadways. 5) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall install subdivision monu- ments as reasonably required by the Roseville Public Works Depart- ment and Ramsey County Surveyor. 6) Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall pay all unpaid subdivision review escrow fees as detailed in the adopted fee schedule for the City of Roseville prior to the City releasing the Plat for recording. 7) The applicant shall make all submissions and perform all require- ments pertaining to final plats set forth in Roseville City Code, includ- ing Sections 1002.01, 1102.04, 1102.06 and 1102.07. 8) The applicant shall obtain the written certification from the Public Works Director described in Section 1102.06 of Roseville City Code. 9) The City Council, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, shall determine whether the proposed use for the property is a permit- ted use. No building permits shall be issued for any use of the proper- ty which is not a permitted use. 10) No building permits shall be issued for any use of the property until the conclusion of the appellate matter captioned as "In the Matter of the Petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for a Pro- posed "Wal-Mart Store in Roseville, Ramsey County, Minnesota" (Writ of Certiorari dated June 21, 2012). Councilmember Pust apologized to the public and fellow Councilmembers for her late arrival tonight; and asked patience as she clarified her remaining ques- tions, some of which may have been addressed prior to her arrival. Coun- cilmember Pust reviewed her perception of the Appeal process and referral to the Planning Commission for their recommendation to the Board of Adjust- ments and Appeals. Councilmember Pust questioned when those recommenda- tions would return to the Board of Appeals, and what opportunities would be provided for public comment and at which body. Mayor Roe reiterated the process, with non-formal public testimony opportuni- ties provided at the June 11, 2012 Planning Commission meeting, as well as again at the July 16, 2012 Board of Adjustments and Appeals meeting. Councilmember Pust commended staff's most recent recommendation in break- ing up the Preliminary and Final Plat approval process, serving to address her previously-expressed concerns with that process. Councilmember Pust, based on her research, opined that the Preliminary Plat portion was very important in the decision-making process, and essentially the only time conditions could be applied to that potential approval process. Since this is a significant decision, Councilmember Pust respectfully requested that fellow Councilmembers con-