My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0709
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2012 2:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/19/2012 2:43:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/9/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
William J.Ma linen <br /> July 9,2012 <br /> Page 5 <br /> that it is denying preliminary plat approval until it reviews the issues raised in the appeals <br /> of the June 21, 2012, decision by the Community Development Department. <br /> 3. THE CITY SHOULD DENY TEE PRELIMINARY PLAT UNTIL THE <br /> MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS DETER1VCINES THAT THE AUAR <br /> REMAINS VALID. <br /> RGR has challenged the City's May 21, 2012, determination that the Wal-Mart <br /> project is exempt from environmental review under MEPA. That challenge is cugently <br /> pending in the Minnesota Cottrt of Appeals. One of the grounds for the challenge is that <br /> Alternative Urban Areawide Review ("AUAR") is no longer valid as a "substitute form <br /> of environmental review" and that an EAW must be prepared for the Wal-Mart projedt <br /> because the City has not amended the AUAR and its plan AN mitigation as required by <br /> Minn. R. 4410.3610. The Community Development Department's June 21, 2012, <br /> decision relies heavily upon the adequacy of the AUAR. Because the adequacy of the <br /> AUAR is in,question,the City should issue specific findings under Minn. Stat. § 462.358, <br /> subd. 3b; that it is denying preliminary plat approval until it has the benefit of a judgment <br /> from the Minnesota Court of Appeals that the AUAR remains adequate. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Thaddeus R. i oot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.