My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-07-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-07-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2012 3:29:47 PM
Creation date
7/19/2012 3:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/24/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
534 <br />Chair Vanderwall suggested that staff check for consistency with the ordinance <br />535 <br />for phosphorus loading; and include language "near water resources," in that <br />536 <br />section as well. <br />537 <br />538 <br />Member Stenlund noted that a phosphorus law was already in place, but the Plan <br />539 <br />needed to reflect that provision and based on soil tests to ensure water quality. <br />540 <br />541 <br />Goal 6 — Coordination and Collaboration (Table 12) <br />542 <br />Ms. Bloom noted that while the Implementation Plan included coordinating with <br />543 <br />schools via HANC educational opportunities, the School District and other <br />544 <br />collaborative efforts could also be included. IAL <br />545 <br />546 <br />Chair Vanderwall noted the overall desire for the City to coordinate with other <br />547 <br />agencies and groups. <br />548 <br />549 <br />Member Stenlund noted the need to make classification information available to <br />550 <br />students and provide opportunities for them to have access to that information and <br />551 <br />552 <br />553 <br />554 <br />555 <br />556 <br />557 <br />558 <br />559 <br />560 <br />561 <br />562 <br />563 <br />564 <br />565 <br />566 <br />567 <br />568 <br />569 <br />570 <br />571 <br />572 <br />573 <br />574 <br />575 <br />576 <br />577 <br />578 <br />579 <br />those features, and their understanding of the differences of those features (e.g <br />wetlands versus storm water ponds). <br />A261 NO 1% <br />Member Felice"§Wted including that statement in the policy to clarify it. <br />Member Stenlund questioned the location of "engineered green space <br />construction," through the use of plant materials and trees to improve water <br />quality. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that this was discussed via Low Impact Development (LID) <br />efforts. <br />Member Stenlund noted the need, once developed, to regulate and maintain that <br />green space and avoid it being converted to something else. <br />Page 13 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.