2012_0723_as amended - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the Board of Adjustment an 1 th d Appeals of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 16 day of 2 July 2012 at 6:00 p.m. 3 The following Members were present: _________; 4 and ____ was absent. 5 Board Member ____________ introduced the following resolution and moved its 6 adoption: 7 A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF A PERMITTED USE 8 WITHIN THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT 9 WHEREAS, on June 8, 2012, the Roseville Community Development Department 10 received a formal request from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., seeking an administrative zoning decision 11 determining whether the operation of a retail and grocery store at a parcel of land to be platted as 12 nd Lot 1, Block 1, Twin Lakes 2 Addition is a permitted use under the City’s Zoning Code; 13 14 WHEREAS, on June 21, 2012, the Roseville Community Development Department 15 issued a formal administrative zoning decision determining that said retail operation indeed is a 16 permitted use under the applicable portions of the City’s Zoning Code; 17 18 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2012, the City of Roseville received an appeal of the 19 administrative zoning decision from property owner Karen Schaffer pursuant to Section 1009.08 20 of City Code; 21 22 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2012, the City of Roseville received an appeal of the 23 administrative zoning decision from a property owner collective known as Solidarity of West 24 Area Roseville Neighbors (“SWARN”) pursuant to Section 1009.08 of City Code; 25 26 WHEREAS, said appeals each sought reversal of the administrative zoning decision from 27 the Board of Adjustments and Appeals on the basis that the proposed land use is not a permitted 28 use under the City’s Zoning Code; 29 30 WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustments and Appeals conducted a public meeting on July 31 16, 2012, to hear and receive evidence on the matter from all interested parties, including a 32 recommendation from the Planning Commission, as well as the general public; and, 33 34 WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, upon due deliberation in a public 35 forum, adjudicated the matter on July 16, 2012, by majority vote in favor of affirming the 36 administrative zoning decision of the Community Development Department; 37 38