Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Gaughan echoed the Mayor’s concerns that no arbitrary figure was used, and <br />332 <br />thereby undermining the appropriateness of this type of condition. City Attorney Gaughan <br />333 <br />cautioned the City Council to avoid moving anywhere near an arbitrary and capricious situation. <br />334 <br />Councilmember Pust respectfully requested a five minute recess to research past meeting <br />335 <br />minutes specific to projected service levels by Chief Mathwig. <br />336 <br />Recess <br />337 <br />Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:44 pm and reconvened at approximately <br />338 <br />7:54 pm. <br />339 <br />Councilmember Pust advised that her research specific to proposed Condition #12 had provided <br />340 <br />projections, from Chief Mathwig, of between 700-900 additional calls per year with a retailer the <br />341 <br />size of the proposed Wal-Mart. <br />342 <br />City Manager Malinen advised that he had consulted with Chief Mathwig by phone during the <br />343 <br />recess, and Chief Mathwig advised that the SuperTarget Store in Roseville had an average of 175 <br />344 <br />service calls per year of various types. City Manager Malinen advised that Chief Mathwig had <br />345 <br />opined that a number of 300 calls per year for a similar operation, and based on the proposed <br />346 <br />Wal-Mart size and facility, appeared reasonable. <br />347 <br />Councilmember Pust opined that such a condition would also allow a new business to establish <br />348 <br />their business model. <br />349 <br />City Attorney Gaughan advised that he was unable to provide a definitive answer as to whether <br />350 <br />the proposed language of Councilmember Pust’s amendment (Condition #12) provided sufficient <br />351 <br />statistical analysis to avoid any arbitrary or capricious concerns; and based on the significant <br />352 <br />retail already in Roseville, questioned how a determination could be made as to what factors <br />353 <br />played into those statistics. <br />354 <br />CONDITION #12 (REVISED) <br />355 <br />Pust moved, Johnson seconded, amendment to the original motion by the addition of <br />356 <br />Condition #12 that: “Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall agree to enter into a <br />357 <br />Development Agreement satisfactory to the City, which includes a provision that for one (1) <br />358 <br />year, Wal-Mart will pay for any law enforcement costs associated with services provided to <br />359 <br />their operations in excess of a base line of three hundred (300) calls per annum; with a review <br />360 <br />of that data after one (1) year) for any potential adjustment. <br />361 <br />Will Matzek, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Civil Engineer of Record for Wal-Mart <br />362 <br />Development Team <br />363 <br />On behalf of the applicant, Mr. Matzek asked only that Wal-Mart be treated similar to everyone <br />364 <br />else within a similar zoning classification and/or retailers throughout the community in general. <br />365 <br />Councilmember Pust opined that this condition would serve to treat Wal-Mart fairly and <br />366 <br />similarly. <br />367 <br />Mayor Roe spoke in support of the one year review for comparison and expectations of the <br />368 <br />applicant and City in order to provide the best possible services for all parties. <br />369 <br />In terms of being treated fairly, Councilmember Johnson opined that the Wal-Mart representative <br />370 <br />brought up a fair point; and in the spirit of that, suggested that going forward in that spirit, that <br />371 <br />the City consider a policy in the future with similar language as a City Council responsibility, <br />372 <br />rather than setting it forth arbitrarily. Councilmember Johnson opined that tonight’s debate had <br />373 <br /> <br />