My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0723_as amended
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0723_as amended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:41:30 PM
Creation date
7/20/2012 4:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0B <br />ACKGROUND <br />11 <br />4.1The properties, located in Planning District 14, have Comprehensive Plan designations of <br />12 <br />Office (O) and Low-Density Residential (LR), and zoning classifications of <br />13 <br />Office/Business Park (O/BP) and Low-Density Residential 1 (LDR-1) Districts. <br />14 <br />4.2Brown-Wilbert, Inc. has been blowing the snow from its parking area onto the large rear <br />15 <br />yard of 2253 Dellwood Street with the consent of the former property owner. Since this <br />16 <br />residential property was offered for sale early in 2012, the applicant purchased the <br />17 <br />property to incorporate the large rear yard into its own site for the sole purpose of <br />18 <br />continuing the snow storage without relying on permission from future owners of the <br />19 <br />residence; they intend to resell the remaining residential property upon the approval of <br />20 <br />the proposed . <br />RECOMBINATION MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />21 <br />4.3A application has been submitted in lieu of the preliminary plat/final <br />MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />22 <br />plat process because §1104.04E (Minor Subdivision) of the City Code establishes the <br />23 <br />recombination process to simplify those subdivisions which seek “to divide one recorded <br />24 <br />lot or parcel in order to permit the adding of a parcel of land to an abutting lot...[in such a <br />25 <br />way that will] not cause any portion of the existing lots or parcels to be in violation of <br />26 <br />this regulation or the zoning code.” The current proposal meets these criteria. <br />27 <br />5.0RPMS <br />EVIEW OF ROPOSEDINORUBDIVISION <br />28 <br />5.1City Code §1103.06 (Lot Standards) requires single-family residential parcels to be at <br />29 <br />least 110 feet deep and comprise a minimum of 11,000 square feet of land area. The <br />30 <br />proposed, reconfigured Parcel A (shown in the site plan included with this staff report as <br />31 <br />Attachment C) would be 130 feet deep and would include about 14, 840 square feet of <br />32 <br />area. A conservative measurement of the existing impervious coverage at 2253 Dellwood <br />33 <br />Street totals about 4,200 square feet, which would be about 28% coverage on the <br />34 <br />proposed Parcel A. Since impervious coverage would be below 30%, the proposal would <br />35 <br />not reach the threshold for storm water mitigation requirements of §1004.08C <br />36 <br />(Improvement Area). <br />37 <br />5.2City Code §1004.02A (Residential Accessory Buildings) requires detached garages to be <br />38 <br />setback a minimum of 5 feet from the rear property boundary. While the gray rectangle <br />39 <br />representing the detached garage in Attachment C appears to cross the proposed property <br />40 <br />boundary, that rectangle should not be taken as an accurate representation of the location <br />41 <br />of the garage. In case the existing detached garage is, in fact, less than 5 feet from the <br />42 <br />realigned rear property boundary, addressing this nonconformity should be made a <br />43 <br />condition of an approval of the proposed ; a <br />RECOMBINATION MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />44 <br />substandard setback could be addressed in one or more of the following ways: <br />45 <br />a.The location of the proposed realigned property boundary could be adjusted to be 5 <br />46 <br />feet from the existing garage. <br />47 <br />b.The existing garage could be removed or relocated to another location on Parcel A to <br />48 <br />achieve the required setback. <br />49 <br />c.The applicant could apply for approval of an if the <br />ADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATION <br />50 <br />existing garage is not less than 3 feet from the realigned rear property boundary. <br />51 <br />PF12-009_RCA_072312 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.