My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 11:27:48 AM
Creation date
7/31/2012 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bloom also reported on the informational meeting for the public held on June <br /> 21, 2012;, and the disappointing turn out(3 residents) even after a direct mailing <br /> to all property owners living on lakes, a published notice and on-line notices. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that staff and the consultant were currently reviewing options <br /> to invite the public again, perhaps—with the permission of the PWETC— at the <br /> July PWETC meeting. <br /> S.E.H. Project Manager Ron Leaf, Sr. Water Resources Engineer and Rebecca <br /> Nestingen, PE, Water Resources Engineer with S. E. H. were present to review <br /> the latest revisions and seek additional Member comment. <br /> Mr. Leaf advised that additional information had been received from the Lake <br /> Owasso Study and would be incorporated into the Plan. <br /> At the request of Chair Vanderwall, Mr. Leaf led the PWETC through the goals <br /> section by section and noted comments for previous goals, as well as those added <br /> after the last discussion. <br /> Section 1. Introduction <br /> Member Gjerdingen expressed concern with the opening paragraph and reference <br /> to the freeway systems; suggested that the comment was out-of-date and indicated <br /> one mode of transportation and Roseville as a bedroom community. Member <br /> Gjerdingen suggested alternative language indicating that Roseville was an inner- <br /> ring suburb, located in closer proximity to both Minneapolis and St. Paul. <br /> Mr. Leaf concurred that such a revision also tied into the sustainability goals of <br /> the updated Plan, and should be reflected in the overall flavor of the plan. <br /> Section 4. Goals and Policies (pates 13— 18) <br /> Section 4.1 (Insert Narrative) <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted the need to included in the narrative the areas of <br /> Roseville that have experienced flooding issues for years; and those things that <br /> had been significantly improved, as well as those things yet to be done. Chair <br /> Vanderwall noted the need to recognize existing problems in the goal statement <br /> and the goal to correct those problems, while recognizing budget constraints and <br /> the need to prioritize those items or address them in the most cost-effective <br /> method possible. <br /> Ms. Bloom reiterated that the purpose of this Plan was to establish policies and <br /> goals for use to guide discussions and the process to address problems. <br /> Mr. Leaf opined that it was worth clarifying, to the best extent possible, that while <br /> there was no guarantee that there wouldn't be ongoing flooding issues depending <br /> on actual rain events, the City would attempt to achieve a reasonable level of <br /> Page 7 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.