My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 11:27:48 AM
Creation date
7/31/2012 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
protection through design standards that supported the goals and policies of the <br /> Plan. <br /> Goal 1 —Flood Protection and Runoff Management (Table 7) <br /> Member DeBenedet expressed concern that, as a substantially developed <br /> community, a broader policy statement was needed that the City would attempt to <br /> provide flood protection through runoff management and through enhancement of <br /> existing drainage facilities and management of those facilities. Member <br /> DeBenedet noted that consideration of time spent, resources committed, and cost- <br /> effectiveness, all needed to be part of the discussion. <br /> Section 2.1 Climate and Precipitation (Table 1, page 3) <br /> Member DeBenedet questioned if this section needed to be updated to give <br /> consideration to anticipated updated precipitation numbers coming in the next <br /> year; and in anticipation that those updated numbers may be higher. Member <br /> DeBenedet suggested that it may be worthwhile to have a paragraph included in <br /> this section describing what could happen if those precipitation levels were <br /> increased and how it would affect this Plan. <br /> At the request of Member Felice, Mr. Leaf provided a definition of"freeboard <br /> elevations" in Policy 4 related to the lowest homes level compared to the high <br /> water level for a 100-year design standard. <br /> Member DeBenedet, related to that question, asked a similar question based on <br /> assumptions for freeboard calculations measured from the lowest floor elevations <br /> (e.g. Millwood Avenue pond); with Mr. Leaf advising that it could be dependent <br /> on various scenarios. <br /> Using the Millwood Pond as an example, Ms. Bloom noted the project proposed <br /> for this year extended the flared end section to improve the freeboard for this <br /> pond. <br /> Member DeBenedet asked that the Plan include freeboard elevations accordingly. <br /> Goal 2— Surface Water Protection (Table 8) <br /> At the request of Member DeBenedet, Ms. Bloom confirmed that the Rice Creek <br /> Watershed District (RCWD) did not have the same standards for redevelopment <br /> in problem areas; and advised that the City was aware of problem areas and the <br /> need to implement long term solutions in those areas. Ms. Bloom used the I-35W <br /> corridor and Fairview Avenue as examples of problem areas; and staff s <br /> awareness of issues within that watershed area. Ms. Bloom advised that <br /> whenever a redevelopment or improvement project came forward, staff made sure <br /> that the storm water review included requirements for property owner(s) to take <br /> care of their portion of the water capacity issues at that time. Ms. Bloom noted <br /> that, while RCWD may not require it, the City did require compliance with water <br /> quantity concerns for larger rain events. Ms. Bloom advised that the City had <br /> Page 8 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.