Laserfiche WebLink
37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />Staff would begin this project by working with survey firm to develop the questions to be asked. <br />40 <br />As was done with the previous survey, the questions would be submitted for Council approval <br />41 <br />prior to conducting the new survey. <br />42 <br />43 <br />PO <br />OLICYBJECTIVE <br />44 <br />Meet the Council adopted a Community Aspiration to be “Engaged in Our Community's Success <br />45 <br />As Citizens, Neighbors, Volunteers, Leaders, and Businesspeople” and by routinely seeking <br />46 <br />community input to evaluate and continuously improve city services. <br />47 <br />48 <br />BI <br />UDGET MPLICATIONS <br />49 <br />The 2012 budget includes $10,000 for a citizen survey in the Communications division budget – <br />50 <br />a non-property tax supported division and another $15,000 in 2013. It was originally anticipated <br />51 <br />that the survey would be prepared in 2012 and executed in 2013. However, the expedited <br />52 <br />timetable would require council to modify the budget so that the entire expenditure would occur <br />53 <br />in 2012. Two of the three proposals are within the budget. <br />54 <br />55 <br />SR <br />TAFF ECOMMENDATION <br />56 <br />Authorize staff to contract with one of the three survey firms to conduct a resident survey. <br />57 <br />58 <br />RCA <br />EQUESTED OUNCIL CTION <br />59 <br />Authorize staff to contract with one of the three survey firms to conduct a resident survey. <br />60 <br />Prepared by: Tim Pratt, Communications Specialist <br />Attachments: A: Survey RFP <br /> B: 2011 Survey questions <br />Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />