Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Human Rights Commission <br />February 22, 2012 - Minutes <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Open meetings law that protects the citizens' right to know outweighs the convenience of <br />the commission members. <br />Ms. Beckman noted the City Council's email policy and suggested the Commission follow it. City <br />Manager Bill Malinen clarified that all commissioners are subject to the electronic communications <br />policy. He said communications should be one way to avoid unintentional violation of the law. <br />Chair Grefenberg opened the discussion with stating that he had changed his mind regarding the <br />wisdom of allowing all commissioners to attend any committee meeting and wondered whether <br />there were other ways to allow full communication between commissioners and to foster a sense of <br />cohesion and camaraderie among commissioner without requiring every meeting be posted. He <br />gave an example of a recent committee meeting which he had advised a commissioner not attend <br />because the meeting had not been posted. <br />Chair Grefenberg raised the issue of the best way to share communications, asking whether <br />communicating about logistics for a program or trying to schedule a meeting would violate the law. <br />City Attorney Beckman agreed that it would not; the discussion must be about official business. An <br />email about time of a meeting or refreshments would not be considered official business, but it <br />could give the appearance of a discussion. She warned against someone adding something about <br />official business that would make it a violation of the open meetings law. <br />Commissioners asked about the HRC rule which allows any commissioner to attend any committee <br />meeting, which may mean a quorum of the commission. City Attorney Beckman said if keeping that <br />policy all meetings must be noticed, and meetings are open and should be in a public venue. <br />Chair Grefenberg discussed other ways to prevent meetings from involving a quorum and Attorney <br />Beckman agreed they would work as well. <br />Commissioner Groff suggested that committees be limited to three members to prevent a violation. <br />Some commissioners expressed interest in attending a committee if they plan to discuss a specific <br />topic. <br />Commissioner Kristin Doneen expressed her concern that there may be times when a Commissioner <br />is interested in attending a Committee meeting, and that this does not necessarily mean that the <br />discussion warrants time at the regular Commission meeting. An example was a book list for the <br />upcoming book club; if Commissioners want to be part of this discussion, then they may desire to <br />attend the Programming Committee where they discuss it. She proposed that, in such cases, the <br />Commissioner wanting to attend notify the Committee so that the meeting could then be noted. The <br />attorney said that this would be a way of handling such cases. <br />City Manager Malinen said he was concerned about transparency. The public recognizes and <br />expects the HRC to meet at a regular time and place, and by calling committee meetings, the public <br />does not necessarily know of the time and location of committee meetings. He suggested that <br />commissioners offer their opinions or feedback at the regular meeting and have the committee <br />address their concerns. <br />