Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting AND <br /> Board of Adjustments and Appeals <br /> Monday,July 23, 2012 <br /> Page 31 <br /> Mr. Munson provided an update, including pictures, of current violations, con- <br /> sisting of fascia boards with peeling paint and some sections rotted, various <br /> windows with peeling point, deck sagging badly and protective paint mostly <br /> peeled off, lower garage door panel in need of protective paint (all violations of <br /> City Code, Sections 407.02.J & K); and piles of dead brush in the yard (viola- <br /> tion of City Code, Section 407.02.D). Mr. Munson estimated that the abate- <br /> ment, consisting of replacing rotted fascia, painting fascia and windows where <br /> replaced and/or where paint is peeling, painting the deck and lower garage door <br /> panel; disposal of dead brush; and disposal of empty plastic jugs would cost ap- <br /> proximately$2,250.00 <br /> Mr. Munson noted that the owner was not present at tonight's meeting. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Munson advised that staff had <br /> been unable to confirm that this home was actually in foreclosure; and clarified <br /> the process in assessing the property for an abatement and eventual recovery of <br /> the money. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Matthew Snyder,2201 Draper Avenue (next door) <br /> Mr. Snyder clarified that this house had been vacant for approximately one (1) <br /> year; and he had last observed the owner this past spring. Mr. Snyder advised <br /> that it was his understanding that the owner currently lived in Bloomington, <br /> MN, and was not currently interested in selling the home, but that he did not <br /> understand the house to be in foreclosure or at risk of foreclosure. Mr. Snyder <br /> noted that the neighbors had paid to have the lawn mown periodically, and that <br /> the home continued to need additional upkeep, with staff only addressing a few <br /> of those items. Mr. Snyder opined that the roof was in very bad shape, and sus- <br /> pected it was leaking, and suggested that when the abatement was performed, <br /> staff may become aware of that additional issue. Since the owner, when she <br /> visits the property, frequently opens the windows for extended times, Mr. <br /> Snyder opined that he also suspected development of a mold issue due to this <br /> apparent leaking roof. <br /> Johnson moved, Pust seconded, authorization to the Community Development <br /> staff to abate the public nuisance violations at 2211 Draper Avenue, by hiring a <br /> general contractor to replace rotted fascia, paint fascia where replaced and <br /> where paint is peeling, paint windows where paint is peeling, and fix deck sup- <br /> ports where sagging, paint deck and lower garage door panel, dispose of dead <br /> brush, and dispose of empty plastic jugs; at an estimated cost of$2,250.00; with <br /> actual abatement and administrative costs billed to the property owner; and if <br /> not paid, staff is directed to recover costs as specified in City Code, Section <br /> 407.07B. <br />