2012-06-19_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HRA Meeting Minutes – Tuesday, June 19, 2012 Page 3 1 Member Majerus confirmed that this was identified later in the document in more detail. 2 3 Member Masche spoke in support of the Mission Statement, noting that it provided a “Living 4 Smarter” tone, as well as providing a snapshot of the intentional goals of the HRA moving 5 forward, and doing so in a measurable way. 6 7 Ms. Kelsey, from her perspective, opined that the Mission Statement provided for other 8 partners and/or developers to get an immediate sense of what the Roseville community was 9 looking for. 10 11 Member Masche concurred that this should serve to effectively inform others. 12 13 Mr. Trudgeon advised that feedback from previous discussions had been incorporated into this 14 draft, and if they were in agreement with this revised version, recommended that the HRA 15 adopt the DRFT. 16 17 Chair Maschka opined that the HRA’s Work Session had been great. 18 19 Motion: Member Majerus moved, seconded by Member Masche to adopt the DRAFT 20 Mission Statement and Strategic Plan for 2012 – 2016 as presented. 21 22 Ayes: 5 23 Nays: 0 24 Motion carried. 25 26 Implementation Plan 27 Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the DRAFT Implementation Plan and its intent to provide a 28 framework to facilitate moving forward with the goals and objectives, as well as budget 29 implications, of the HRA’s updated 2012-2016 Strategic Plan. Mr. Trudgeon noted that items 30 already in process in some capacity were defined separately from those new initiatives 31 identified by the HRA; and further clarified that the document would continue to change as 32 projects and initiatives moved forward. 33 34 Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff had preliminarily identified some items specific to anticipated 35 budget implications and potential sources of funds; however, he noted that before going into 36 substantial detail, further prioritization by the HRA would be needed. Mr. Trudgeon noted that 37 there would be obvious HRA Levy implications with this upgraded and revised role for the 38 HRA in achieving goals and objectives. 39 40 Member Majerus spoke in support of the DRAFT Implementation Plan and its thoroughness 41 for the HRA moving forward. Member Majerus asked that staff continue to provide 42 benchmarks comparing the Roseville HRA with other metropolitan HRA’s specific to funding 43 sources, staffing, hours, and demonstrable impacts. Member Majerus noted the need to 44 continually incorporate program measures for each initiative. 45 46 Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff would do so as much as possible; however, he noted that some 47 items would be more challenging to compare than others, but that staffing was one area that 48 allowed for reasonable benchmarks. 49 50 Member Majerus advised that his concern was that the HRA was continually able to 51 effectively demonstrate what was being accomplished in comparison with other HRA’s. 52 53 Mr. Trudgeon concurred, noting that it was reasonable to continually demonstrate that the 54 community of Roseville was getting much more for their investment in the HRA than other 55 metropolitan area communities.