Laserfiche WebLink
352 <br />When Ms. Bloom questioned if such a path would be considered an ADA surface, <br />353 <br />Member Stenlund advised that MnDOT was building some with gravel. <br />354 <br />355 <br />Chair Vanderwall opined that seasonal trails (e.g. ski trails discussed but not <br />356 <br />included) had not been incorporated into the original Master Plan. <br />357 <br />358 <br />Member Stenlund questioned if it was better to have a seasonal trail, if you <br />359 <br />already owned the land or no trail at all if funding was not available. <br />360 <br />361 <br />Ms. Bloom noted that there were several well - b ils or footpaths identified <br />362 <br />on the map. <br />363 <br />364 <br />Member DeBenedet opined that Member Stenlund's suggestion made sense, if the <br />365 <br />public understood that development of the pathway would be a staged process, <br />366 <br />with it graded, aggregate applied, and compacted for a period of time until and if <br />367 <br />funding could be found within five 5 years. <br />368 <br />369 <br />Ms. Bloom reminded the PWETC that County Road B might be a conversation, <br />370 <br />but feedback from prope owners was needed before moving too far along. <br />371 <br />372 <br />Member Stenlund sugges other area for "low hanging fruit" may be to <br />373 <br />consider single -track pathw s, or off -road cycling paths in more wooded areas. <br />374 <br />375 <br />Mr. Schwartz advised hat this discussion was held as part of the Parks and <br />376 <br />Recreation Master PI rocess, with Member Gjerdingen noting that this was <br />377 <br />already happening in rvoir Woods. <br />378 <br />Page 9 of 16 <br />