My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0827
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 8:48:05 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:44:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 27,2012 <br /> Page 12 <br /> While impacts will vary based on home values and changes in that value since <br /> 2012, for a median single-family home in Roseville, Mr. Miller advised that <br /> values were declining on average by 8.7%, with those homes paying $739 for <br /> City taxes in 2013; an increase of$4 per year, or $4.57 per month; with the pro- <br /> posed HRA Levy resulting in an additional $1.28 per month. <br /> In comparing local tax rates with peer communities from 1995 —2011 (e.g. met- <br /> ropolitan area cities with a population greater than 10,000), Mr. Miller noted <br /> that Roseville continued to be below average. However, Mr. Miller further not- <br /> ed that this was in part to Roseville not investing in its capital needs for a num- <br /> ber of years while other communities were doing so. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust, Mr. Miller advised that, while many as- <br /> sumptions were in play, factoring in the City's debt service on bonds, the City <br /> will move closer to the average, reflected in the renewed investment in capital <br /> needs; however, it still shouldn't approach the highest average among peer cit- <br /> ies. <br /> In conclusion, Mr. Miller addressed utility rate impacts to address the 20-yaer <br /> water and sewer infrastructure needs estimated at $66 million, with only $22 <br /> million in available funding, leaving a funding gap of$44 million. Mr. Miller <br /> referenced the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Task Force created by the City <br /> Council with representatives of the City Council and staff to address and make <br /> recommendations on that funding gap. Mr. Miller noted that, in 2011, the City <br /> Council had chosen to apply the proposed utility fee increase over a two (2) <br /> year period as opposed to all in one (1) year; with half applied in 2012, and <br /> 2013 as the final year for phasing the rate increases in on base water and sewer <br /> rates for single-family homes city-wide. Mr. Miller noted that an increase of <br /> $6.23 per month was already in place as implemented in 2012, with an addition- <br /> al $6.22 per month slated for 2013. Mr. Miller noted that following that final <br /> phase-in in 2013, thereafter only inflationary increases would occur to those <br /> rates, as recommended by the CIP Task Force. <br /> Mr. Miller reviewed other utility rate impacts, not within the control of the City <br /> of Roseville, including an estimated increase of 4-6% for purchasing water from <br /> the City of St. Paul Costs for purchasing water from City of SP; an estimated <br /> increase of 4-5% for wastewater treatment costs from the Metropolitan Council; <br /> and other inflationary impacts. Mr. Miller advised that, for a typical single- <br /> family home in Roseville, this would result in an additional increase of$0.59 <br /> per month for water/sewer operations; for a combined total impact of fees and <br /> inflationary increase of$6.81 per month. <br /> Using the peer group comparison again for first ring suburbs with a with stand- <br /> alone systems and having a population of between 18,000 and 50,000, Mr. Mil- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.