My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0827
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 8:48:05 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 10:44:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 27,2012 <br /> Page 33 <br /> tioned whether this created an existing, non-conforming use; and expressed <br /> concern with creating a land-locked LDR parcel with approval of this request. <br /> In response, Mr. Lloyd advised that light manufacturing was allowed in the Of- <br /> fice/Business Park zoning district; and clarified that this patch of land would <br /> continue to have LDR guidance in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning <br /> Code. Mr. Lloyd further clarified that this property line was not being added, <br /> but was simply a relocation of an existing property boundary and not a separate <br /> parcel and matching the zoning of others within the parcel boundaries of or <br /> larger business parcel boundaries. While not as clean as preferred, Mr. Lloyd <br /> advised that this would not serve as the first example in Roseville with one par- <br /> cel overlapping another parcel's zoning. Mr. Lloyd further advised that the City <br /> did not have the ability to require zoning changes or Comprehensive Plan <br /> Amendments based on changing property boundaries. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Lloyd advised that Planning <br /> staff did not think that by the applicant acquiring this property for snow storage, <br /> it created a commercial use on an LDR parcel; and as standard operating proce- <br /> dure, snow storage was not regulated except for shopping center properties. Mr. <br /> Lloyd clarified that snow storage was not regulated except for properties like <br /> shopping centers and large offices; snow storage could not reduce minimum <br /> parking space requirements; nor could snow be consolidated into one large pile <br /> from an office or shopping center in an area of residential zoning beyond one <br /> (1) week. Examples of this restriction were discussed specific to short- and <br /> long-term snow storage. <br /> Councilmember Johnson noted that he had visited the site as well, and observed <br /> a definite "little valley" in the area of most concern with drainage, specifically <br /> Mr. Wright's property that he and Mr. Wright had walked. Councilmember <br /> Johnson opined that he could see future snow remediation in the future due to it <br /> going to the low density lot; as well as Mr. Tschida's property and others north <br /> of the newly-acquired property. Councilmember Johnson noted that there was a <br /> sizable, six foot (6') drop off where snow would be stored and seeping into <br /> those back yards; and questioned if any consideration had been given by staff <br /> for the potential melt into those yards in the spring. <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that there were currently no restrictions without the conditions <br /> staff was attempting to include on this Recombination Minor Subdivision re- <br /> quest; with the back yard drains potentially covered. As far as snow storage is <br /> concerned, Ms. Bloom reiterated that today there were no restrictions as to <br /> where the snow could be piled, since the Code had no restrictions at this time. <br /> From the perspective of snow melt causing additional issues, Ms. Bloom opined <br /> that piled snow typically melts slowly, and can be spread out to reduce flow;but <br /> either way the snow was still going to be there with or without the subdivision; <br /> and still has to be managed by the owner. Ms. Bloom advised that staff was at- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.