Laserfiche WebLink
September 19, 2012 <br />Item 7.b <br />Civic Engagement Task Force <br />b) Explore new media channels (Facebook, YouTube, blogging, etc.) to connect with and <br />actively engage Roseville citizens with an emphasis on two -way communication. <br />c) Create an area of the website (or web -based communications) focused specifically on <br />public engagement information and resources for citizens, including two -way <br />communication (see Edina's Citizen Engagement blog as an example). <br />5.3 Policy Intent or Practice: The city should enhance access to City Council and <br />commission agenda items, minutes, and recorded meetings through its (and/or North <br />Suburban CTV's) website. <br />We recommend the City: <br />a) Publish approved city council and commission meeting minutes on the city website in a <br />timely manner, such as within one week of approval. If public meeting minutes are not <br />approved in a timely manner, such as within one month, publish draft minutes on its <br />website until minutes are finalized. <br />b) Offer the full text of meeting agendas in the body of email alerts rather than requiring the <br />extra step to click a link to learn of the full agenda. <br />c) Include a link to the specific recorded televised city meeting on the same page as the <br />meeting minutes and /or agenda. Currently it takes at least 8 clicks through 2 different <br />websites to access a specific recording, and these links are not easy to find. <br />d) Ensure online video streaming is optimized for citizens at average connectivity. <br />5.4 Policy Intent or Practice, The city should foster direct and efficient email <br />communication with public officials. <br />Rationale: Citizens are more apt to contact public officials if provided a direct email <br />address. Although the current online communication form allows citizens without email to <br />make contact, it has its drawbacks: 1) citizens cannot send attachments with their emails, 2) <br />citizens cannot retain a record of communications sent, 3) public officials cannot receive <br />email immediately (esp. difficult over the weekend) and thereby cannot respond as efficiently <br />and easily; and 4) staff time is spent forwarding messages unnecessarily. <br />We recommend the City: <br />a) Create and publish public, city - domain email addresses for city council members and <br />commissioners to directly receive email from and send email to citizens on public matters <br />without requiring city staff to manually forward such messages. (The online contact form <br />may still be useful for individuals without email.) <br />b) Automatically forward messages sent to the City Council's single email account to these <br />new public addresses for council members. <br />September 12, 2012, Penultimate Draft 1.2 13 <br />