Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Cify Council Meeting <br />DRAFT Minutes of Monday, Jume 18, 2007 <br />Page 2i <br />1 NIr. Brian Carey provided comment on the success of their previous <br />2 Roseville senzor housing p�rojects; existing waiting list of thirty peo- <br />3 ple; and their enthusiasm to work on another proj ect in Roseville. <br />4 <br />5 Mr. Ca:rey advised that the current plan was solely in response to the <br />6 request by staff and fhe Park and Recreation Commzssion to provide <br />7 access to Langton Lake Park, with the developer's preference being <br />8 the original plan that provided transition for single-family hames by <br />9 including the twin homes south of the co--op building. Mr. Carey ad- <br />10 vised that if the City Council thought the first plan was more appro- <br />11 priate, the developer would be willing to work with the City on thai <br />12 option. <br />13 <br />14 Councilmember Ihlan suggested that the City Council consider an ex- <br />15 tension of the 60-day land use review, opining that there seemed to be <br />16 a huge number of policy questions and environmental issues ihat <br />17 needed to be considered, and additional information provided to the <br />18 City Council before they could make a decision. <br />19 <br />20 Councilmember Pust questioned the intent of the developer and their <br />21 preferred design layout; and whether they were presenting fhis site <br />22 plan, or wanted to xeturn to their previous dcsign; and whether the de- <br />23 veloper should seek to delay Council action on the proposed site plan <br />24 before them tonight to allow time for the developer and staff to work <br />25 out more details. <br />26 <br />27 Mr. Carey clarified that, while the developer would have preferred a <br />28 Study Session with the City Council as the plans developed, the de- <br />29 veloper was before the City Council tonight requesting approval o� the <br />30 plan before them with staff support, rather than delaying the project <br />31 fiirther. <br />32 <br />33 Mr. Hall noted that, by eliminating the twin homes for the project, and <br />34 compromising by including the access road to the park, the developer <br />35 had significanily reduced their profii potential by approximately $1 <br />36 million. <br />37 <br />