Laserfiche WebLink
�lu�e 8, 2flQ7 <br />Pag� 2 <br />seems viabfe, Ruth wants to rema�in on fhe property. <br />li is aU well and good for opponents of any project to want to look back on the <br />good old tiays, when fields, f2�rms and open spaces were plentiful, and to bemoan this <br />projec#, or any project for that matter, as beir�g "too big," but the facis are clear: <br />1. Ruth Partridge needs to find a new home - hopefully a new home i� the <br />deve�opment proposed by United Properties. <br />2. Ti�is property is guided far higher density, and the proposed pra�ect will <br />meet the corr►munity's needs #or this type of housing. <br />3. United Properties is a thoughiful, respansibfe and experienced deveioper <br />of this type of residential community within the City of Roseville and <br />elsewhere. <br />4. While affecting the neighbors, as � deveiapm�nt would, ihis project has <br />t�ee�� designed ta provide as gen�le a trar�sition from sir�g�e-�a�ily homes <br />io commercial properties as is reasanably possible. <br />5. The City Planner has recommended approval of the project, and his report <br />to t�e Planning Commission states his unbiased reasons for appraval. <br />On behalf of Ruth Partridge, lifelong resident of the City of RosevilEe, we <br />respec�fully request tt�at City Council approve the development proposed by United <br />Properiies. <br />Thank you for your consideration of our request. <br />Sincerefy, <br />John B. Winston <br />J BWltcrm <br />