My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0723_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0723_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:20:04 PM
Creation date
9/21/2012 1:04:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
676
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session <br />Monday, July lb, 2007 <br />Page 22 <br />1 Mayor Klausing noted the language of the Public Works, Environ- <br />2 ment and Transportation Commission as required by siaiute; with staff <br />3 clarifying the language wording related to a"negative declaration as <br />4 to an EIS." <br />� <br />N <br />. <br />. <br />�o <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />i5 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />3� <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />City Attorney Anderson provided additional clarification of State <br />Statute procedures related to the RGU's ability to postpone their de- <br />termination for thirty (30) days if they feel there is insufficient in�or- <br />mation to make that detennination; requesting that the proponent <br />gather and bring forward identified and readily-abtainable informa- <br />tion. Mr. Anderson further clarified, and Mayor Klausing confirmed, <br />that if the information was not deemed readily obtainable, and it was <br />determined that they were needed to address whether there were sig- <br />nificant environmental impacts needing further study, that would be a <br />posiiive declaration for the need for an EIS, if �hose items in all prob- <br />ability will not be mitigated or propexly identif ed. Mx. Anderson <br />concluded that the EAW served as ihe scoping document to determine <br />if an EIS was warranted. <br />Mayor Klausing interrupted the meeting for a determination of which items were <br />included in additional discussion prior to the extended meeiing time. Those items <br />were identified and approved by consensus, as items S.g, S.h, and 5 j, respectively <br />entitled, "Discuss completion of the Updated AUAR or of a discretionary EAW <br />prior to approval of the land use application �or 2700 Cleveland Avenue;" "Presen-- <br />tation of the Revised Draft Twin Lakes AUAR;" and "Discussion on the Housing <br />and Redevelopment Authority Appointment Process." <br />g. Discussion — Discuss Completion of fhe Updated Alternative Ur- <br />ban Areawide Review (AUAR) or of a Discretionary Environ-. <br />mental Assessment Workshee# (EAW} Prior to Approval of the <br />Land Use Application for 2700 Cleveland Avenue <br />Community Development Director John Stark reviewed staf�s re- <br />quest that approval of fhe land use application for 2700 C�eveland <br />Avenue (C�nt Ventures) be withheld until completion of the updated <br />Twin Lakes Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) or until the <br />applicant agrees to participate in the completion of a Discretionary <br />EAW. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.