My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0910
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2012 1:11:04 PM
Creation date
9/25/2012 1:11:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/10/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 10, 2012 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Mayor Roe noted that by purchasing existing homes at their current value it <br /> would be higher than potential empty lot sales, not allowing the HRA to recoup <br /> demolition and original costs, thus the need for a net loss in the budget, in an ef- <br /> fort to spur housing redevelopment. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon concurred with Mayor Roe's statement, in addition to funding <br /> operating costs. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that, while she was in general agreement with <br /> the goals and ideas expressed in the HRA's Strategic Plan, she had a general <br /> purpose problem in authorizing the money without the City Council retaining <br /> any control after that point, allowing the HRA to do as they chose. Specific to <br /> this proposed program, Councilmember McGehee noted that there was concern <br /> expressed in the recent past about homes being built in neighborhoods that <br /> didn't match the rest of the neighborhood (e.g. McMansions). If the HRA em- <br /> barked on such a program, Councilmember McGehee asked that consideration <br /> be given or a stipulation in City Code that infill housing could not be out-of- <br /> character from the existing neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon responded that this is a fair concern to ensure similar develop- <br /> ment. While no current program guidelines had been developed until a program <br /> had been approved, he advised that the HRA would want to preview plans for <br /> any infill housing to make sure they were compatible; and to avoid someone <br /> purchasing a lot for new construction and then seek variances. Mr. Trudgeon <br /> advised that the program criteria would need to be vetted if it moved forward; <br /> and that demonstration criteria, in addition to the City's current design standards <br /> and code requirements should suffice. To-date, Mr. Trudgeon advised that this <br /> was not a tremendous problem in Roseville, with a number of infill lots having <br /> redeveloped and typically in character with surrounding homes. However, Mr. <br /> Trudgeon noted that the HRA and staff were well aware of the need to be cau- <br /> tious and proactive. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus as to current design controls could <br /> address those concerns, Mayor Roe noted that the newly-adopted design stand- <br /> ards and codes were intended to address and prevent such occurrences and keep <br /> housing in character within neighborhoods. Councilmember Willmus also not- <br /> ed that the HRA could use deed restrictions to control that issue. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Finance Director Miller clarified that the HRA <br /> Levy was also a Preliminary, not-to-exceed levy. <br /> Roe moved, Willmus seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11010 (Attachment <br /> A) entitled, "A Resolution Submitting the Housing and Redevelopment Au- <br /> thority, in and for the City of Roseville, Special Property Tax Levy on Rea Es- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.