My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-08-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-08-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2012 9:51:34 AM
Creation date
10/1/2012 9:51:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/27/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bloom noted that Table 12, Policy#5 also addressed this; and would further <br /> enhance this effort for water quality and landscaping efforts. <br /> Ms. Nestingen noted that Policy#5 in Table 12 also addressed multi-use green <br /> space as noted by Member Stenlund for dual use areas. <br /> Section 5 Issues Assessment (page 27) <br /> In Section 5.1, Mr. Leaf suggested additional pictures to show past examples; <br /> with Member Stenlund offering examples of before/after pictures from the South <br /> Owasso Boulevard project that he had monitored. <br /> In Section 5.2, Member Stenlund noted the ongoing issues, such as unfunded <br /> pond clean out and what to dredge. Member Stenlund advised that there could <br /> potentially be millions of dollars in liability depending on out the sludge is <br /> classified. <br /> Mr. Leaf noted that Section 5.2.3 discussed this, and since it was so significant, <br /> suggested that it be modified to further highlight that potential. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested that something more descriptive be used about the <br /> cost difference. <br /> Mr. Leaf suggested obtaining information from the City of White Bear Lake as an <br /> example of the potential cost. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested that Mr. Leaf contact Mike Thompson at the City <br /> of Maplewood for their detailed study he completed as part of his Capstone <br /> Proj ect. <br /> Member Stenlund suggested including examples of problem areas as well. <br /> In Section 5.2.4 Education and Outreach, Chair Vanderwall suggested a different <br /> title, since other agencies could also be involved, and to emphasize collaboration <br /> to imply that people need to work together. <br /> Member Stenlund reiterated his idea for partnering with watershed districts, and <br /> getting the High School curriculum involved in these efforts as well. <br /> Section 6 Implementation Program and Funding (page 29) <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted the need for table column headers to be reformatted. <br /> In response to Member Gjerdingen's question on Table 14, Policy#8 regarding <br /> the Rosedale Mall area, Ms. Bloom clarified that this would need to be explored <br /> with the Rice Creek Watershed District for a project similar to that built at the <br /> Maplewood Mall. Ms. Bloom noted that this would be a future collaborative <br /> effort. <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.