My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-08-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-08-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2012 9:51:34 AM
Creation date
10/1/2012 9:51:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/27/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bloom encouraged PWETC members to the Open House at Maplewood Mall <br /> scheduled for September 15, 2012, being hosted by the Ramsey-Washington <br /> Metro Watershed District. <br /> Regarding Member Gjerdingen's concerns with regional zoning and borders, Ms. <br /> Bloom noted that each area was different, and when approached, staff was happy <br /> to consider options. <br /> Mr. Leaf noted that the reason the Maplewood Mall area project was able to <br /> proceed was due to the planned upgrades on the property, all under one owner, <br /> and cost savings to incorporate landscape and storm water improvements as part <br /> of that project. <br /> Member Stenlund expressed appreciation for including shoreland in the Surface <br /> Water Protection portion of the implementation plan (page 34). <br /> Section 7.0 Plan Adoption and Amendments (Page 35) <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted that the process was well-defined, as further noted in <br /> Section 7.2.2 Staff Review (page 36), providing for a process with some <br /> flexibility. However, in Section 7.2.1 Request for Amendments (page 36), Chair <br /> Vanderwall questioned who could bring forward a request for an amendment, and <br /> how time-consuming this potential could be for staff. <br /> Mr. Leaf reviewed the actual process, and noted that staff s response would <br /> determine whether or not a request would move beyond the PWETC or City <br /> Council; and legal requirements for administrative appeals and a process yet to be <br /> defined. <br /> Ms. Bloom concurred, noting that this was under discussion and would be further <br /> reviewed at the staff/consultant level; based on legal considerations and <br /> requirements. Ms. Bloom advised that she didn't envision an amendment to the <br /> plan without it first coming before the PWETC. <br /> Mr. Leaf reviewed the remaining process in developing Draft #3, based on <br /> tonight's feedback, opining that he didn't see any changes of substance in the <br /> plan; and would confer with staff on edits to get the next draft out for agency <br /> review and keep the process moving forward toward adoption by year-end. Mr. <br /> Leaf noted that additional graphics could be added at any time, not necessarily <br /> during the review process. Mr. Leaf thanked the PWETC for their hard work in <br /> reviewing this document and providing good feedback. <br /> Chair Vanderwall thanked Mr. Leaf and Ms. Nestingen as well. <br /> 6. Possible Items for Next Meeting— September 25, 2012 <br /> • Pathway Master Plan Build-Out Discussion <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.