Laserfiche WebLink
have 14 former employees who are on the City’s health plan through COBRA. <br />32 <br />33 <br />The City of Roseville’s contract with NJPA for employee health insurance through <br />34 <br />Health Partners will renew on January 1, 2013. The initial renewal rate was 4.97% <br />35 <br />and the final negotiated renewal was a 2.33% overall increase. However, because each <br />36 <br />plan within Roseville’ structure has a different claims experience with the self-insured, <br />37 <br />the actual increases will vary some within the overall 2.33% increase. The $2,000 <br />38 <br />deductible plan will have a 4.42% increase, the $1,000 deductible plan will have a <br />39 <br />2.52% increase and the $2,500 deductible will get a .52% decrease. <br />40 <br />41 <br />The plans offset each other. The $2,000 plan that had a 115% premiums to claims ratio <br />42 <br />would have had a 35% increase and the $2,500 plan that had a 14.5% premiums to <br />43 <br />claims ratio would have had a 50% decrease. Any way you look at it, this increase is <br />44 <br />substantially better than in years past and better than the NJPA trend of 4.5% and the <br />45 <br />national trend of approximately 7.5% increase. Staff has continued to show a change in <br />46 <br />behaviors, and claims have shown great improvement over the past four years. <br />47 <br />48 <br />Last year the City conducted a comparison study and found that comparable cities with <br />49 <br />high deductible plans actually had a bit lower out of pocket maximums than Roseville <br />50 <br />but also had higher premiums and City contributions costs. Thus, the costs by the City <br />51 <br />and the employee were similar to the average because comparable cities were paying <br />52 <br />up front and the employee at Roseville was taking on more out of pocket risk in the <br />53 <br />case of an event. <br />54 <br />55 <br />Attachment A is a historical summary of Roseville’s health insurance renewals and the design <br />56 <br />changes that have been made. The City’s contribution increase is not included because there has <br />57 <br />not been a method that has consistently been used, such as percentage of premium increase or set <br />58 <br />dollar increase covered by the City. Therefore there is no way to consistently lay this out <br />59 <br />historically because there have been too many variables each year in the budgeting decision <br />60 <br />process. <br />61 <br />62 <br />Finally, Roseville is moving to a new online open enrollment system which our benefits <br />63 <br />broker Financial Concepts is paying for this year. Employee census and demographics <br />64 <br />is being loaded to the system currently with the City’s contribution and final plans <br />65 <br />information scheduled to be completed by the end of this week. System testing will be <br />66 <br />conducted the final two weeks in October and full roll out to all staff will occur on <br />67 <br />th <br />November 5. <br />68 <br />69 <br />City Contributions Background and Recommendations: <br />70 <br />71 <br />Historically we have maintained a philosophy of paying 100% of the premium for <br />72 <br />medical and dental insurance for the single plan. This also remains the trend in the <br />73 <br />marketplace, although the market continues to move away from paying 100% for rich <br />74 <br />coverage plans (as Roseville has already done). <br />75 <br />76 <br />In 2004 the City Council began moving to a more equal contribution per employee, <br />77 <br />regardless of the employee’s family status and lifestyle choices, as supported by an <br />78 <br />employee survey done that year. Strides toward equal contribution halted in 2008 due <br />79 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />