My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1982 - Summary of City Government
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Summary of City Government
>
1982 - Summary of City Government
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:01:13 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 10:05:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� <br />z707 P�ORTN LF�ICl�T[IIa AVEf'JUf iELEPHQNE 484-33T1 a S �j v i P <br />. ~ NlIN!'/ESO <br />� TA 55113 <br />�`- <br />July 3�, 1973 <br />biAINTENA��ICE �F SANITARY SEit1ER SERVIC� SET{�EEN HQNE AND ASAIN SEZYER <br />The ViI].age of Roseville, as athex communities throughout the country, has <br />fflllowed a grocedure of undertaking maintenance on the sanitaxy sewer system <br />anly on the main sewers in the roadway. I� has not done maintena.nca on the <br />service from this main sewer to buildings, even in that partion of the service <br />that is withzn the right-af-way or easement cantrolled by the village. This <br />procedure is speZled out zn the Village Code zn S�ction 7?.190 Pazt 7I and <br />reads as foZiows: <br />"It sha21 be the responsibility oi the owner or occupan� to snaintain <br />the sewer sezvice from the main.sewer to the house or buildzng." <br />This procedure has been done for many years and in general has proven satis- <br />factoxy, botti in Roseville and throughou� the na�ion. There are, however, <br />instances where this creates a hardshi.p on the property owner because ot <br />expenses incurxed to repa.ir damaged sewer sex-vices in the right-o£-way which <br />occurred thraugh Vz.Ilage :.neglz�ence. The Viilage recognzzes this hardship <br />and is establishing this policy to deal with it. <br />The property owner shouid contact the contractor of his/her choice who zs <br />licensed to do such waxk in the Village, ta]ce out the necessary permits, have <br />the work inspected as usual. The exception to this being that the contractor <br />should be specificall.y informed that he is to cantact the Village just before <br />uncoverin� the Iead �rom the main at the suspected point of the probl�m and <br />have a.ri inspector there at the t�me the pipe is exposed. This will afford the <br />Vi2lage the opportunity to get first-hand in£ormation as to the cause of the <br />p�oblem and to make a determination as t� whe�her this problem tvas the result <br />of the Vi2lage negligencc in any manner_ If it was determined hy the inspector <br />that indeed the Vi�lage was negligent in regard to this serv�.ce from the main <br />to the point of connec�ion to the lead from the house, then the Village wi11 <br />assume the expense o� correctino this problem. This assumed liabi,lity, however, <br />is to be iimzted to the expenses zncurred in this particular instance. It should <br />be� made clear that if the Village i.nspector is not there at ttte time of the pz�y� <br />exposure and the problem certifi.catiion,that the Vi3lage will not pay for the <br />expenses regardless of the clai.med conditions. <br />I� there axe any unresolved pxoblems ar questions relating to <br />contact me and I wz1l be happy to revzew the procedure. Thank <br />your cooperation in helping to meet this problem and for your <br />understandina, <br />L '!',!.. , /��� ']/. ���.��s��� <br />Charles V. f�ma�����} <br />Public {s���s �zrsEtar <br />this policy, please <br />you very much �or <br />assistance and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.