My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1995_PCS_Packets
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Police Civil Service Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
1995
>
1995_PCS_Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 11:03:41 AM
Creation date
10/10/2012 9:44:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, ,.�^ ., �•� =� "h 'ii-°°: ;�''�i�� <br />Whatevet the activiry — restoring order and calm <br />at accident atid crime scenes, serving as custodians <br />of those found guilty of crimes, carrying out <br />court orders, quelling domestic and other dis- <br />putes, enduring abuse or confronting those with <br />deadly weapons — it is clear that the jaw enforce- <br />ment �ob has exceptiona�ly unique demands. <br />These demands in turn require an equally <br />unique m� of the mental, physical, social and <br />other personal characteristics nccded to meet the <br />enforcement job challengc without becaming <br />bumt out in the process. The problem, howcver, <br />always has been how best to identify the best <br />candidates for the job, even more so now when <br />the world is more dangerous, more violent, and <br />more unpredictable than ever before. <br />r�E� �r�s��r�� ����.Ei�... <br />�'�y..f��'� !�: „�°,r. T�$ .t�. �4; �T � Y S'Tf � ��� �z,.�T Nr+° ��' T 7 � <br />Identifying tk�e best law enforcement candidates <br />clearly requires a testing system which goes <br />beyond the traditional approach of just mental <br />abiliry testing. <br />Modern agencies todaq are laoking to assess <br />other critacal behaviors which are known to be <br />associated with successful job performance. They <br />are concerned with sucl� prediction issues as <br />reliabiliry, achievezx�ent orientarion, work values, <br />emotion and temper control, enthusiasm for the <br />job, and social skills with the public and ali groups <br />within it. Their goal is to have a job-related, <br />multi-dimensional testing technique which can <br />be used as a pre-screen to the more expensive <br />phqsical and psychological testing and back- <br />ground checks which follow. <br />,�.1�1�.��� ��.X�'�'�f -l�� ]�'�F: �'� � �]`°+1,�I. .ANe����. <br />'The RBH Law Enforcement Candidate Record <br />(LECR), the product of a massive and ongoing <br />job-relatedness research program, is a multi- <br />dimensional testing system developed to �neet <br />today's need to identify the very best. <br />In its present form, the LECR combines tra- <br />ditional verbal-vocabulary and perception- <br />memory tests with a specially-developed back- <br />ground questionnaire on academic history, <br />work history and preferences, social skills, <br />present self concept and values and reasons for <br />applying. This new combination therefore pro- <br />duces scores which are based on more than <br />just mental ability. <br />The LECR Program focuses not only on the <br />need to identify the very best candidates, but <br />also on the need to sho�w proofs that selection <br />procedures address civil rights requirements. The <br />I,ECR t4iereforc is supported by a massive <br />weight of statistical proofs, the kind of proofs <br />which are the most difficult to achieve, but the <br />rriost conclusive in the event of a c.hallenge. <br />The LECR research design also is one specifi- <br />cally endorsed by tl�e federal government's <br />Uniform Guidelines on Em�loyee Selection <br />Procedures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.