My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1015
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2012 1:48:40 PM
Creation date
11/1/2012 1:48:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/15/2012
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 15,2012 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, from a management perspective, she <br /> thought those issues would be worked out during the design stages; noting that <br /> the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) may not sufficiently address <br /> ongoing maintenance needs in the future. Councilmember McGehee further <br /> opined that an employee could be trained in on the process and coordinate activ- <br /> ities with Mr. Evenson in conjunction with Arizona State, allowing for one ad- <br /> ditional person as the keeper of design standards for the projects. Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee opined that this was a new day for the Parks and Recreation De- <br /> partment moving forward in setting standards and branding goals over the next <br /> few years, and work would continue to escalate. Councilmember McGehee fur- <br /> ther opined that this responsibility should not be relegated to only a few availa- <br /> ble people; and while recognizing that Mr. Evenson brought his historical and <br /> technical expertise to the table, it would be advantageous to have someone with <br /> complementary skills to his. Councilmember McGehee opined that such a ma- <br /> jor project should not rely on a consultant,but be supported by in-house staff. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that staff could certainly take Councilmember McGehee's <br /> recommendations under advisement; noting that the entire process was evolv- <br /> ing, as well as the Public Works Asset Management Software Program and ap- <br /> plicable staffing and the expertise and management controls that would provide <br /> city-wide. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his appreciation for Councilmember <br /> McGehee's observations and comments; suggesting that the discussion certainly <br /> may come forward down the road. Councilmember Willmus further recognized <br /> the response of Mr. Brokke for his and City Manager Malinen's consideration <br /> and background analysis of value of in-house staff versus consultants at this <br /> time. Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of staff's recommendation, <br /> opining that it appeared to be the best route indicated at this time. <br /> Councilmember Johnson echoed the remarks of Councilmember Willmus; and <br /> recognized the comments of Councilmember McGehee about future staff needs. <br /> However, Councilmember Johnson opined that now was not the time for that <br /> evaluation beyond that already done by staff prior to this recommendation. <br /> With a new City Council in place in the future, Councilmember Johnson opined <br /> that this would be sufficient time to address those needs. Councilmember John- <br /> son recognized the complexities of upfront planning, and spoke in support of <br /> staff's recommendation to seek outside consultation as the most cost-effective <br /> approach to utilize expertise for that planning. Councilmember Johnson con- <br /> curred that the design work and planning necessary for implementation required <br /> a vast amount of work to be done; and expressed his confidence in having ex- <br /> pert advice available moving forward; and reiterated his support of the recom- <br /> mendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.