My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_1119_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_1119_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2012 11:37:13 AM
Creation date
11/15/2012 2:58:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> DATE: 11/19/2012 <br /> ITEM NO: 7.d <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Request by United Properties for approval of vacation and rededication of <br />a drainage easement to accommodate the final phase of development at <br />1996 Langton Lake Drive (PF07-006). <br />PF07-006_RCA_111912 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />Application Review Details <br /> Public hearing: November 7, 2012 <br />(4-0) PC approval recommendation <br /> RCA prepared: November 13, 2012 <br /> City Council action: November 19, 2012 <br /> Statutory action deadline: December 4, 2012 <br />Action taken on an easement vacation request <br />is legislative in nature ; the City has broad <br />discretion in making land use decisions based <br />on advancing the health, safety, and general <br />welfare of the community. <br />1.0 R EQUESTED A CTION 1 <br />United Properties requests the vacation of an existing drainage and utility easement and 2 <br />the rededication of a new easement to fac ilitate Phase II of the Applewood Pointe at 3 <br />Langton Lake senior cooperative residential development. 4 <br />2.0 S UMMARY OF R ECOMMENDATION 5 <br />On November 7, 2012 the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing 6 <br />regarding the United Properties vacation request. No citizens were present to address the 7 <br />Commission and there were no questions of staff by Commissioners. The Planning 8 <br />Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Public Works Department 9 <br />recommendation to approve of the proposed EASEMENT VACATION ; see Section 7 of this 10 <br />report for the detailed recommendation. 11 <br />3.0 S UMMARY OF S UGGESTED A CTION 12 <br />Adopt a resolution approving the proposed EASEMENT VACATION ; see Section 8 of this 13 <br />report for the detailed action . 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.