My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2012 11:52:23 AM
Creation date
11/28/2012 11:52:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,October 22,2012 <br /> Page 38 <br /> they charged more for that frosting. Councilmember Pust questioned how this <br /> was different; and why determining who would come out as the best for the job <br /> wouldn't come out through the other categories. Councilmember Pust also not- <br /> ed all proposers having to go through the interview or an actual meeting, with <br /> them reviewing their past performance, and questioned why they should get <br /> separate points for how well they presented themselves in that interview. <br /> Given the time constraints for further discussion, City Manager Malinen noted <br /> that this was a time-sensitive action required at tonight's meeting. <br /> Roe moved to extend the meeting to 10:15 p.m. Due to lack of a second, Mayor Roe declared <br /> the motion failed. <br /> Pust moved, McGehee seconded, extending the meeting to 10:05 to complete this discussion. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Johnson; Pust; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> City Manager Malinen reviewed the interview step in the best value process <br /> geared toward getting into the interview; with all other criterion considered sep- <br /> arate from that interview; at which time their ability to fill in the blanks for the <br /> best interest of the City was determined, and allowing interviewers to drill into <br /> the finer details for additional information. Mr. Malinen advised that the inter- <br /> view was a highly valued part of the process. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, in the best value process, the interview was part of that <br /> defined process; with City Manager Malinen responding in the affirmative. <br /> Councilmember Pust expressed her concern with the definitions, and how the <br /> weighting was used, whether it was applicable to all contracts, or needed to be <br /> based on the service or product being sought on a case by case basis. <br /> Mr. Malinen advised that this process had been vetted internally by staff, with <br /> weighting specific to this service. Mr. Malinen advised that giving a minimum <br /> weighting to values of all versus the highest cost allowed any equality issues or <br /> problems to be avoided. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that a better practice would be to take criterion and <br /> weight them for each specific RFP, determining ahead of time based on the <br /> right criterion; further opining that any particular percentage would not be right <br /> for each RFP. <br /> City Manager Malinen noted that if a determination could be made for this spe- <br /> cific RFP, further action and discussion could occur in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.