My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2012 11:52:23 AM
Creation date
11/28/2012 11:52:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 22,2012 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested moving forward on a case by case basis; to <br /> which Mr. Paschke noted that this would not be an option, since the City could <br /> not grant variances for a use, and it would therefore make it difficult to consider <br /> requests on a case by case basis. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that, since an actual application was not current- <br /> ly before the City Council on which to base their discussion and consider a spe- <br /> cific example, any action be deferred until a better context was available in <br /> which to frame this discussion and decision-making. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that, going forward, he was not opposed to <br /> looking at refinements as recommended by staff; however, he suggested looking <br /> at this in a broader view and revisiting what the City hoped to achieve and other <br /> things identified in the Comprehensive Plan guidance and Zoning Code practi- <br /> cal application that may need revisiting all at once. Councilmember Willmus <br /> advised that he also had concerns with the Community Mixed use as currently <br /> worded; opining that he was unsure if staff was applying that use in the intended <br /> direction. While not wanting to totally deny this request, Councilmember <br /> Willmus advised that this request did not work for him as presented. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested that a business seeking to expand their use <br /> come before the City Council requesting a Conditional Use; to which Mr. <br /> Paschke advised that this was not an option as it was restricted not only by City <br /> Code,but by State Law. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust, Mr. Paschke noted that there was not <br /> critical time issues on this request, as no applications were currently pending. <br /> Pust moved, Johnson seconded, TABLING this item to a date uncertain for fur- <br /> ther discussion. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Johnson; Pust; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Staff duly noted Mayor Roe's request that, when the item appeared before the <br /> Council in the future, a copy of the Comprehensive Plan description of Regional <br /> Business, and that the Zoning Code Charts outlining uses be included as part of <br /> the agenda packet at that time. <br /> b. Adopt an Ordinance Creating a Zoning Code Definition for Limited Ware- <br /> housing and Distribution <br /> Based on the previous discussion, Pust moved, McGehee seconded, TABLING <br /> this item to a date uncertain for further discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.